Viewing entries in
Blog Post

6 Comments

Ensuring fairness for bicyclists involved in collisions

By Nikko Bilitza

Councilmember Grosso recently introduced the “Bicycle and Motor Vehicle Collision Recovery Amendment Act of 2014.” This bill would make it easier for cyclists to get compensation for damage sustained in accidents with cars, by ending the legal use of contributory negligence in automobile-bicycle collisions. Contributory negligence is a legal defense that argues that the plaintiff in a negligence case cannot receive compensation if they are even one percent responsible for the damage. For example, Driver A is making a left turn and hits Driver B, who was driving over the speed limit through the intersection.  Driver B sustains injuries and sues Driver A for negligence but loses because Driver B was driving over the speed limit, which contributed to the injury.

Only four states use contributory negligence, a legal defense that is unfair for traffic cases considering that plaintiffs often have to pay off expensive medical bills or vehicle repair bills. This bill will help cyclists who often get the raw end of the deal in traffic cases due to jurors or police misunderstanding how laws apply to cyclists. According to a study by the League of American Bicyclist, only 12% of fatal cyclist accidents resulted in any form of punishment for the driver or compensation for the family of the victim. These cases spurred  Councilmember Grosso to propose legislation switching to a comparative negligence standard, which stipulates that the plaintiff is compensated in proportion to their responsibility for the damage. This change is especially timely, as DDOT and Howard University recently reported a 130% increase in collisions involving cars and cyclists in the District from 2010 to 2012.

Source: Traffic Safety Statistics Report for the District of Columbia (2010-2012), D.C. Department of Transportation and Howard University.

Source: Traffic Safety Statistics Report for the District of Columbia (2010-2012), D.C. Department of Transportation and Howard University.

We need to make sure that cyclists affected in these accidents will receive fair and proportional compensation. The Councilmember is pushing to move the bill forward when the Council reconvenes after the summer recess on September 15.

*This post is part of an ongoing series of posts by Councilmember Grosso’s staff to support professional development. All posts are approved and endorsed by Councilmember Grosso.

6 Comments

Comment

What we're reading: July 23, 2014

If you need something to read on your next flight, while you’re waiting in line for your Starbucks order, or want a break from beach reading…here’s a look at what Team Grosso is reading (and watching) this week.

Why Poor Schools Can’t Win at Standardized Testing | Meredith Broussard, July 15, 2014

How can standardized test be gamed? “Not by using a beat-the-test strategy, but by a shockingly low-tech strategy: reading the textbook that contains the answers.” A good look at the economics of testing and the impacts on urban school districts.

Prison | Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, July 20, 2014

On Sunday’s episode of Last Week Tonight, John Oliver’s main story took a look at the racism and brokenness of America’s prison system. Watch the full clip above and make sure to stay to the end for Oliver's adorable "Broken Prison System" sing-along. "It's a fact that needs to be spoken," Oliver and the Muppets sang. "America's prisons are broken."

Gray Administration Launches New FOIA Website | Will Sommer, July 21, 2014

FOIA requests can now be submitted via this website. The Gray Administration in turn will post almost every FOIA response that the executive branch produces. Yay, transparency!

D.C. police use high-risk stings in battle against armed robberies | Ann Marimow, July 22, 2014

Undercover MPD officers are recruiting people they think are likely to commit armed robberies in high-risk sting operations. In the past two years, these operations have resulted in the convictions of more than a dozen men in federal court. “Critics ask how law enforcement officials can distinguish between someone who is just “puffing” and someone who intends to carry out a crime.” Good question.

Principals in U.S. Are More Likely to Consider Their Students Poor | David Leonhardt, July 22, 2014

We always hear that one cost-free way to help improve public education is improve expectations. Well, this recent study adds more evidence to that claim. The researcher finds that principals’ perceptions of disadvantage correlated more strongly with student performance than actual disadvantage. Perhaps expectations do play a role?

Man exonerated in 1982 D.C. killing; DNA reveals FBI error in conviction | Keith Alexander & Spencer Hsu, July 21, 2014

DNA evidence exonerates a man who spent 26 years in prison in the 1982 killing of a Washington woman. The decision came after a 2 ½ year review of all local convictions involving FBI hair matches that was launched after demands by the D.C. Public Defender Service. “I am free at last. I am humbled. I never gave up,” Martin said, hugging and high-fiving his attorneys. “I just want to live.”

Beyond Subprime Learning | Laura Bornfreund, July 16, 2014

The New America Foundation’s new report, Beyond Subprime Learning: Accelerating Progress in Early Education, provides recommendation for improving the quality of interactions between teachers and children at early ages. Their policy recommendations focus on increased and sustainable public funding and streamlining programs, standards, and eligibility requirements.

Comment

Comment

Marijuana Possession Decriminalization Amendment Act of 2014 Effective Today

The District's law decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana went into effect today. While Councilmember Grosso continues to push for full legalization, with taxation and regulation, he certainly supports the important step we took today. Here is some helpful information prepared by the office of Councilmember Tommy Wells about the new law and what it means. Please contact our office with any questions.

 

Marijuana Possession Decriminalization Amendment Act of 2014

Effective July 17, 2014

Decriminalization is not legalization. The use and possession of marijuana remains illegal, but possession of 1 ounce or less will now be treated as a civil offense, not a crime. Individuals caught with 1 ounce or less of marijuana will be fined $25 and will have all visible marijuana and paraphernalia confiscated.

The MPD has created an explanation webpage (http://mpdc.dc.gov/marijuana) that includes the Act, the MPD’s Special Order for officers, and a handy FAQ palm card.

What is no longer a criminal violation?

  • Possession of 1 ounce or less of marijuana.
  • Transfer of 1 ounce or less of marijuana to another person, so long as there is no payment made or any other type of exchange of goods or services.
  • ·Possession of marijuana-related drug paraphernalia (such as bongs, cigarette rolling papers, and cigar wrappers) associated with the use of 1 ounce or less of marijuana.

What happens when an individual is found with 1 ounce or less?

  • The individual will receive a $25 ticket; and
  • Any visible marijuana or paraphernalia will be seized.

What is still a criminal violation?

  • Possession of more than 1 ounce;
  • Selling any amount of marijuana to another person;
  • Smoking or consuming marijuana in public;
  • Driving or operating a vehicle or a boat while impaired;
  • Refusing to provide an officer with one’s name and address (however, there is no requirement to carry or display proof of identity).

What’s the deal with the smell of pot?

The bill states that the following factors, individually or in combination with each other, will not provide a law enforcement officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime:

  • The odor of marijuana or burnt marijuana;
  • The possession of or the suspicion of possession of marijuana without evidence of quantity in excess of one ounce;
  • The possession of multiple containers of marijuana without evidence of quantity in excess of once ounce; and
  • The possession of marijuana without evidence of quantity in excess of one ounce in proximity to any amount of cash or currency.

The odor provision was included because if the possession or private use of marijuana is no longer a crime, then the smell of marijuana alone would not be evidence of a crime. However, these provisions do not apply when an officer is investigating whether a person is operating or in physical control of a vehicle or a boat while intoxicated, under the influence of, or impaired by alcohol or drugs.

What about the federal law enforcement agencies?

  • Federal law continues to prohibit the possession or use of any amount of marijuana.
  • Federal law enforcement officers may arrest anyone in D.C. for possession or use of any amount of marijuana as a violation of federal law.
  • Prosecutions for federal law violations would be done by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.

Where do I get more information?

  • LIMS: http://lims.dccouncil.us/Legislation/B20-0409 and click on Bill History for the committee report, amendments, and the enrolled bill.
  • The MPD marijuana page mentioned above:  http://mpdc.dc.gov/marijuana includes a similar FAQ, as well as links to the Special Order the Department has issued to its officers and the palm card MPD is distributing to the public.

Comment

Comment

Pre-K Student Discipline Amendment Act of 2014

On July 14, 2014, Councilmember Grosso introduced the Pre-K Student Discipline Amendment Act of 2014. The bill follows on Grosso's earlier efforts to bring more transparency to discipline in D.C. Public Schools and D.C. Public Charter Schools, such as mandating the District's first report on school discipline. Grosso is committed to this work as part of addressing the school-to-prison pipeline.

Comment

Comment

At Blind Whino, ‘Collateral Damage’ highlights redemptive responsibility

At Blind Whino, ‘Collateral Damage’ highlights redemptive responsibility

By Clinton Yates July 7, 2014, Washington Post

The last time I talked to Tony Lewis Jr., we were discussing the issue from the opposite side. It was the 25th anniversary of his father’s arrest. Today, we were looking at people Tony considers his peers. At “Collateral Damage,” the exhibit that displayed portraits of the family members of incarcerated people, the vibe was redeeming. The aerosol art-soaked Blind Whino venue that housed the photos, appropriately enough, is a former church.

There were more smiles than one might expect; both in the photos and at the gathering. Many visitors posed outside the building before entering to get a shot, a routine that I imagine populated Instagram heavily. And while Sunday was a largely social event in some regards, the fact that it existed at all was significant. Until the D.C. metro area can understand that its incarceration rate is a holistic problem that affects our entire region and not just the people behind bars, the true potential of the populace will never be realized.

This is why BreeAnna Haynes, a fourth-grade science and writing teacher at Stanton Elementary School in Southeast, brought a group of a half-dozen of her students to see the show. The situation in the classroom can’t be ignored.

“I took a poll in my class about how many people in my class had family members locked up and I promise you, out of 22, about 19 people raised their hand and said that they know someone that is locked up that’s close to them,” Haynes, 24, said. “That’s why I’m working, that’s why I brought them. The bigger picture, I don’t think they see it yet. But getting them to understand that the decisions they make now as fourth- and fifth-graders will affect them. If they start the good decision-making now, they won’t even have to be in these kind of situations.”

The “War on Drugs” has put so many people behind bars, and breaking that cycle requires recognizing that a support system needs to exist to help connect those behind bars with the people they care about. Something that D.C. Council member David Grosso, who was there Sunday, understands completely.

“I think it’s extremely powerful and just a real first step in what we have to do to begin to recognize the fact that there are a whole lot of people living in our community that have loved ones that are locked up,” Grosso said. “The fact is that what we’re doing to help people who are locked up is pretty dismal. The system is working against them every single day, and then you think about their families back here.

“In D.C. it’s really appropriate because the fact is we have our residents spread out all over the country in BOP (Federal Bureau of Prisons),” he added. “The phone call is farther away, more expensive, the visit’s impossible. Even Tony Lewis who does this show, his dad was in California. And how do you visit? How do you visit California from D.C.? It’s important to recognize that and make it possible for families to be engaged, because we know for a fact that the more you connect families to people that are in jail, the more likely they are to come out and be a positive part of society again, and give them that chance.”

But on the outside, the kids affected are still people, too. The stigma that comes with having a parent locked up creates tensions, shame and internal strife that is almost immeasurable. It’s what brought Michelle Hare to Lewis. She is a mother of two teenage boys whose father is incarcerated for what she called “a very long time.” Finding the right fit for a mentor was not easy. Her kids, Delfon, 16, and Xavier, 15,  have been working with Tony for three years.

“When he first became incarcerated, I tried to find someone to relate to them and I really couldn’t. They didn’t want to go through therapy, they got bored with the other mentors, and they felt like nobody really understood them,” said Hare, 34, who lives in Upper Marlboro, Md. “It was just a perfect match.”

On the surface, they seemed like fun-loving kids. Both were wearing jeans and polo shirts with perfectly coordinated Nike Air Force 1′s. Xavier’s outfit was pink, Delfon’s purple. They play sports at their schools and had an enjoyable time being a part of the making of the exhibit. In their photos, both are smiling. But it wasn’t always that way.

“If people aren’t personally affected by it, they really don’t pay it any attention, and these are a set of kids that really go forgotten about. They have other issues that other kids don’t have. People look at them differently, I think,” Hare said.

In a funny exchange, the family talked about the growth her sons have gone through.

“I’m open to telling people that my father’s incarcerated. It’s not really a problem. He’s taught me to just be myself and don’t be afraid of who you are,” Delfon said of Tony’s help.

“You weren’t always as open,” his mom quickly pointed out. “I remember, what was the girl’s name? You would NOT tell her that your dad was locked up,” she said with a laugh.

“I mean, she never asked,” Delfon replied.

“You never told!” she said.

“Wasn’t her dad a doctor?” Xavier chimed in.

“Right. So, [your dad] was not a topic of conversation,” Hare said. “I just say that because it shows that it’s okay and other people are going through the same thing.”

Eerily, the prospect of a feedback loop of incarceration and pain that Lewis speaks of was ever-present the whole time. Less than a half-mile away, 1st Police District cars occupy parking spaces all around. Its presence is impossible to miss.

It was something that one mom of a young kid wouldn’t let her son forget. By the picnic tables in front of the entrance, kids were throwing rocks from the driveway into a trashcan against the fence. One kid abstained, knowing his mom was watching. “What if you hit somebody’s car? You gonna pay for it?” his mother asked, in all seriousness. “Chill before I go get the police on you. They’re right down the street.”

The damage is real.

Comment

Comment

Grosso Takes Stand for Women to Make Own Reproductive Health Decisions

Grosso Takes Stand for Women to Make Own Reproductive Health Decisions

Washington D.C.–Today, Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) issued the following statement regarding the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in favor of two for-profit businesses–Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood–who challenged the Affordable Care Act claiming it violated federal law protecting religious freedom by requiring them to offer their employee’s insurance coverage for a variety of methods of contraception:

“The Supreme Court decision in the “Hobby Lobby” case is another example of how the split court has no respect for the rights of women who should be able to make reproductive health decisions free from intervention by anyone.  I strongly believe that no company, regardless of the owners’ personal religious beliefs, should be permitted to interfere with an employee’s reproductive health care decisions.  It is a woman’s personal right and she should not be discriminated against at her work place just because her employer holds a particular religious belief.  My Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014, when enacted into law, will ensure that a woman is protected from discrimination by her employer when making reproductive health decisions and I urge the Council to move quickly on passing this important legislation.”

 

###

Comment

Comment

Council Wants Public To Comment On Proposed Bills With Online Forum

Council Wants Public To Comment On Proposed Bills With Online Forum

Matt Cohen, DCist.com, June 24, 2014

If you've ever sat through a public hearing to comment on a bill proposed by a D.C. Councilmember, you know that it can sometimes be a maddening process. For example, a recent joint committee hearing for two proposed amendments to D.C.'s medical marijuana laws lasted nearly six hours with dozens testifying, many of whom couldn't fit in all they wanted to say in their allotted time. Now, some Councilmembers are working with The OpenGov Foundation—a D.C.-based nonprofit working to open government processes and increase transparency for the public—to make it easier for people to weigh in on proposed legislation.

Recently, OpenGov, with the support of Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large), launched the beta version of MadisonDC, an online forum that allows citizens to directly comment on, propose changes to, and debate current legislation floating within the Council.

"What we're hoping is, this will encourage more public engagement in the legislative process," Grosso told DCist during a recent phone conversation, "and we'll be able to consider all public input on proposed bills." MadisonDC launched a little under two weeks ago with three of Grosso's recent bills posted online, open for public comment: The Urban Farming and Food Security Act of 2014; Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014; and the Marijuana Legalization and Regulation Act of 2014.

It's not unlike message boards or the comments section of many websites. Once you register for a free account, you can read over the proposed legislation and add your own comments, questions, support, opposition, or thoughts to any part of the bill. All the comments will then go to the Councilmember who introduced the bill to read over, consider, and answer before it goes to public hearing.

Though it's still in its beta phase, MadisonDC has already attracted the attention of other Councilmembers, with bills introduced or co-introduced by nearly every Councilmember currently on the website for public comment. At this time, the website hosts thirteen bills and one ballot initiative open for public comment, including contentious ones like the D.C. Soccer Stadium Development Act of 2014, the Wage Transparency Amendment Act of 2014, and marijuana legalization ballot initiative that the D.C. Cannabis Coalition is currently gathering signatures for.

But for those who value the current process, MadisonDC doesn't aim to replace public hearings for proposed bills. "This won't eliminate the public hearing process," Grosso says, "but work in tandem with it, so that we'll be able to as much public input as possible."

OpenGov first launched Madison as a tool to battle the Stop Online Piracy Act. It soon grew into a platform for citizens to participate and voice their questions, comments, and concerns on documents and bills proposed in Congress.

Seamus Kraft, OpenGov's Executive Director and one of the organization's co-founders, tells DCist that he launched it in 2011 with Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Ca.) as a way for citizens to more easily connect with proposed legislation. "There was no way for me to bring together all the input I was getting to implement into our process," says Kraft, who was working as the Director of Digital Strategy and the Press Secretary for the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee when he launched OpenGov. Since launching Madison, Kraft says there's been a "pretty overwhelming response in Congress," as it "makes the policy making process more open for citizens."

But with all that transparency and openness in the lawmaking process—allowing nearly anyone to chime in and share their thoughts— it's easy to see how this could backfire. With no filtering process during registration, couldn't that open up MadisonDC to Internet trolls, much like the comments section of a certain D.C. news website? Grosso doesn't think so. "We have to put trust in our residents," he says.

Though Kraft says there is "no moderation or filter beyond the 'George Carlin filter'," he says that of the millions of page views and thousands of comments on Congressional bills, they've only had to remove six comments.

"The bar is very, very low to sign up and get involved," Kraft says. "We view ourselves as the platform for citizens to swiftly and easily connect with lawmakers and bills, and we have to trust they won't abuse that."

Comment

Comment

Grosso Applauds USPTO Ruling on Washington Football Team Trademark

Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) issued the following statement after the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a ruling canceling the trademark registration of the Washington Football Team name arguing that the registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans at the times in which they were registered:

“This ruling from the USPTO is just another step in moving us closer to changing the name.  Changing the offensive name has been a priority of mine since I have been in office and I will continue with this movement until the name goes.  The USPTO has it right and it’s time for Mr. Snyder to step up and do what’s right for the community that has been impacted by this racist and derogatory name.”

 

Comment

Comment

What a weekend in prison taught me

Opinions

What a weekend in prison taught me

By David Grosso, June 13, 2014, Washington Post

I spent a recent weekend in prison.

As a guest of a program that looks to address the violent daily reality of prison, I had the opportunity — over 20 hours at the maximum-security Patuxent Institution at Jessup, Md. — to reflect on such important issues as human rights, prison culture and conflict resolution.

Some two-thirds of the more than 2 million Americans behind bars are nonviolent offenders, most convicted of drug charges. But in an overcrowded prison system, where many people are serving mandatory minimum sentences, nonviolent prisoners are turning into violent ones.

The Alternatives to Violence Project is one valuable solution to try to stop this trend. Three inmate facilitators work with an outside facilitator to lead the weekend-long program. My group included 25 inmates, with an average age of about 22; all but two of the inmates were African Americans. They deal daily with terrible conditions in the prison. Their basic human rights are violated every day.

Over the weekend, our group took part in workshops, role-playing, policy discussions and more. We worked together to try to better understand our circumstances and learned how to respond in nonviolent ways. The AVP program is based on the “transforming power” concept, with core principles that help inmates make nonviolent choices when confronted with violent situations.

In a small-group exercise, each of us told of a time when we were able to avoid violence using nonviolent tactics. All three inmates in my group had amazing stories that were fresh in their memory; they face these scenarios daily. One spoke about his confrontation with a corrections officer who had neglected to sign him out to go to prayer service. When the inmate returned, he was given a “ticket” for leaving without permission. This turned into an intense debate, and the inmate recognized his emotions escalating into fury. Fortunately, the corrections officer’s superior came in, and the inmate was able to calm down and explain the situation.

The AVP program, which began in 1975 in New York, has been shown to dramatically reduce violence in prison and repeat offenses once inmates return home. It has expanded into high schools, community centers, colleges and refu­gee camps.

Since my visit to Jessup, I think a lot about a 19-year-old inmate who is serving 10 years after his second conviction for dealing drugs (both nonviolent offenses). This young man has lived much of his life behind bars, and our society has failed him.

Of course, those who commit a crime should serve the appropriate sentence. The bigger question, though, is where should a teenager serve that sentence, especially for a nonviolent offense? When we put nonviolent offenders in the same institution with violent offenders, what do we expect to happen?

Society expects an inmate, often with little education, to navigate extremely tough situations. Many inmates landed in prison right out of low-performing schools, and, to make matters worse, their chances of rehabilitation are slim because they do not receive quality educational opportunities or resources to better themselves while serving their sentences.

The prison I visited was old, with narrow hallways and small cells. There was constant noise — somebody screaming or a gate opening or closing. There was also an overbearing presence of authority, including regular ID checks of all the inmates. Crowding and cost-cutting are huge issues. The prison recently eliminated Friday visiting hours and reduced gym rights to four days a week. There is a basic GED program, but the government cut the college education program. Many of the men in my group were frustrated with the effects of the cost-cutting. One inmate wanted to transfer to a prison where more educational opportunities might be available.

These inmates don’t want to get into more trouble. They struggle with the concepts of nonviolence because they are confronted daily with violence — more than any of us can fathom. They mostly don’t want more trouble because prison is an awful place and each inmate wants to go home. To go home quickly, they must avoid being issued tickets and participate in programs such as AVP.

For inmates, pursuing nonviolence in prison means turning the entire system on its head. I learned that the inmate AVP facilitators were highly respected precisely because they reject the violence that surrounds them. If an inmate can master the tools of nonviolence, then he can likely reduce the length of his sentence.

I walked away from the prison with a belief that locking people up for long periods for nonviolent offenses is a danger to society. We need to concentrate on fixing the prisons, and we need to do everything possible to provide help to nonviolent offenders. Society should commit to ensuring that those who serve time in prison come out better than they went in. We must commit to ending arbitrary minimum sentencing, helping rehabilitate those in the system, providing education and job training and, most of all, providing hope for the inmates.

Participating in the AVP program will help me identify and support solutions to the school-to-prison pipeline. Education is a key to helping solve this problem. We must demand that every child be given a fair chance and that our schools (from pre-kindergarten through college) be high-quality and accessible.

I look forward to being a part of the solution and working on quality schools and quality communities. And you can be sure that the next time a bill before me on the D.C. Council includes criminal sanctions, I’ll look at it in a new light, because I have seen up close what it means to require someone to spend time in jail.

 

The writer, an independent, is an at-large member of the D.C. Council.

Comment

Comment

Vacant Lots Could Become Urban Farms Under Bill

Vacant Lots Could Become Urban Farms Under Bill

Matt Cohen, Jun 16, 2014, DCist.com

While parts of D.C.—like the H Street corridor, parts of Petworth, the NoMa area, and others—have rapidly developed in the past few years, there are still District-owned lots throughout the city with no current plans for development.

Under a bill introduced by Councilmembers David Grosso (I-At Large) and Mary Cheh (D-Ward 3), vacant lots and plots of land owned by the District could be turned into urban farms. The amendment to the Food Production and Urban Gardens Program Act of 1986 would "establish an urban farming land leasing initiative," as well as a tax credit for food donations and tax abatement for properties leased for the purpose of becoming small-scale urban farms.

"There's parcels of land in D.C. that, maybe aren't in the right neighborhoods or areas for development yet," Grosso tells DCist. "One of the secrets about development is that it happens when it wants to. It's very hard to create development in a place or location where it's not ready." While Grosso's bill aims to turn these properties into small urban farms, poised to produce locally-grown vegetables and fruits, he says that the vacant lots don't need to remain urban farms forever.

"There's a whole field open near 14th Street and Rhode Island Avenue NE," Grosso says. "Someday, development will happen and it will be good and will hopefully require some affordable housing. But in the meantime, we have a lot of land like that that's owned by the District that's just sitting there."

At last week's hearing on the bill, Mark Chambers, sustainability manager for the D.C. Department of General Services, said it doesn't address or take into consideration certain environmental issues like testing, cleanup, and—D.C.'s favorite problem—rats.

Grosso says that Chambers' concerns are "ill-informed" and that measures to control the rodent population, as well as testing and cleanup, will be addressed once the bill moves forward.

There's also the question of what happens when the city decides to develop the land. Removing an urban farm years in the making in a neighborhood community could create a contentious debate like the one at the farm at Walker-Jones. The proposed redevelopment of the McMillan Park Sand Filtration site, which one group wants to see become a farm, is another example.

"We just have to be conscious and not be afraid of the public debate," Grosso says. "At some point, it may be a good use permanently, or it may just be a good use temporarily, but it's doing something other than what's happening there now, which is nothing. Put a farm there for a while and see what happens."

Comment

Comment

Grosso statement at Urban Farming and Food Security Act hearing

Thank you Chairman Mendelson and Councilmember Evans for holding this joint hearing on B20-677 the D.C. Urban Farming and Food Security Act of 2014 and thank you to the witnesses here to testify today.

 In the District of Columbia 1 out of 3 residents are at risk of hunger, while 1 in 3 District children are at risk of becoming overweight or obese. As obesity and diet-related chronic disease rates continue to rise, the need to create a sustainable food system that provides healthy food which meets all of the city’s current needs and maintains a healthy ecosystem is imperative.

The District, through the Healthy Schools Act and the Healthy Corner Store program is working diligently to reduce food insecurity and improve the health and wellness of District residents, particularly those in neighborhoods without adequate supermarkets and other sources of affordable healthy food; however, more can and should be done.

I introduced this legislation because all District residents, at all times, should have access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life. Food security is built on three pillars: food availability; food access; and food use.

This legislation instructs the Mayor to first identify and then lease certain District-owned vacant lots to independent farmers and farm cooperatives to be used for successful urban farming ventures.  This bill also creates tax incentives to encourage more individuals and businesses to farm locally and donate locally farmed vegetables, fruits, and grains to D.C. food banks or shelters.

By the District leasing its unused vacant property throughout the city to independent farmers and community farm cooperatives, it allows our residents to claim direct access to healthy food by growing, harvesting and processing it themselves.

By incentivizing more individuals and businesses to proactively donate to local food banks or homeless shelters we can support organizations like Miriam’s Kitchen and the Capital Area Food Bank that manage to make wonderful meals for our most vulnerable residents, day-in and day-out.

My goal is to foster a robust conversation around food security and sustainability, which is why I have partnered with the Open Government Foundation to promote transparency.  Using the Madison platform, this bill, as well as others has been uploaded to spur community engagement and allow District residents to comment and offer input.

We have received feedback already, which I will be incorporating today and I encourage anyone watching from home to log in and join the conversation.  We will be accepting questions throughout today’s hearing and while I will not be able to ask them all, I do encourage everyone to utilize this platform and continue to stay engaged on the issues.

A truly sustainable food system encourages local food production and distribution opportunities that make nutritious food accessible and affordable to all District residents.  With this legislation we will continue to improve food availability, food access and food use and I am eager to hear from and engage with all of the witnesses in the discussion to follow.

Comment

Comment

Grosso statement on proposed Commission on Health Disparities Establishment Act

Thank you Chairwoman Alexander and thank you to all of the witnesses here to testify today on Bill 20-572, the “Commission on Health Disparities Establishment Act of 2013.”

The District of Columbia has the seventh highest incidence rate and the highest death rate from breast cancer in the United States. And although the incidence rate for breast cancer is higher for white women in this city, African-American women from Wards 5, 6, 7, and 8 are overrepresented among those dying from the disease.

Even more troubling, African American women in the District are showing up for treatment with advanced breast cancer at rates that are almost double the national average. 

In a report published by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in 2013, it was found that D.C. residents died at a higher rate from preventable heart attacks than any other jurisdiction in the country. 

The CDC report found that, in the District, the rate of avoidable deaths from heart disease, stroke and hypertensive disease was 99.6% per 100,000 population.  The most affected demographic was African-American males ranging in age from 65-74.

These disparities are also found when we discuss behavioral health.  A few years ago there was only one child psychiatrist that was east of the River.  Additionally, 35 percent of the District’s transgender population has experienced suicidal ideation while 39 percent do not have a physician for routine health care as reported by the DC Center for the LGBT Community.

Further, 58 percent of the District’s African-American males having sex with other males are living with HIV, which is significantly higher than the national average at 29 percent. 

We cannot allow these disparities to persist in our communities.  In February, the Department of Health compiled a very comprehensive Community Health Needs Assessment, the first of its kind for the District and I want to applaud the Department for this effort.

All District residents, regardless of race, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, or gender identity deserve access to quality physicians, screenings and treatment.  I will continue to follow this issue very closely and I am eager to hear from and engage with the witnesses in the discussion to follow.

Comment

Comment

Two long reads for the long weekend

Here are two recent articles that I found interesting, and thought you might like to read over this long weekend:

Schooled

Cory Booker, Chris Christie, and Mark Zuckerberg had a plan to reform Newark’s schools. They got an education.

by Dale Russakoff May 19, 2014

The New Yorker

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/05/19/140519fa_fact_russakoff?currentPage=all

 

Who Gets to Graduate?

By PAUL TOUGH MAY 15, 2014

New York Times Magazine

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/magazine/who-gets-to-graduate.html?_r=0

    Comment

    1 Comment

    Grosso prepares for weekend in prison

    By Councilmember David Grosso

    Beginning this afternoon and continuing throughout the weekend, I will experience the Alternatives to Violence Program (AVP) at Patuxent Institution in Jessup, Maryland.  I will join inmate facilitators and other participants engaging together in the AVP workshops inside the prison. 

    The AVP program began in 1975 with a group named “Think Tank” who started an experimental program for youth at Green Haven Prison in New York.  The group was compelled to provide nonviolence training in preparation for their roles as counselors. “Think Tank” then partnered with the Quaker Project on Community Conflict and created a prison workshop that is currently provided in seven institutions.

    What led me to participate in this three day workshop in Patuxent is a desire to experience first-hand whether or not the AVP method can help in stemming the senseless violence in D.C. – from neighborhood beefs, to violence within our schools. Within the first two months of this year, the murder rate has doubled in D.C and as a community we must stand together to say enough is enough.  The violence has to stop!

    I will share with you my reflections on the AVP workshops. I look forward to your comments and working together to create a city that can embrace nonviolent conflict resolution as a standard practice.

    1 Comment

    Comment

    Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014

    A BILL

    IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

     

    Councilmember David Grosso introduced the following bill, which was referred to the

    Committee on __________________.

    An ACT to amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 to ensure that individuals are protected fromdiscrimination by an employer or employment agency based an  individual’s or dependent’s reproductive health decision making.

                BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014”.

                Sec. 2. Section 211 (D.C. Official Code § 2-1402.11) of the Human Rights Act of 1977, effective December 13, 1977 (D.C. Law 2-38; D.C. Official Code § 2-1401.01 et seq.), is amended to add a subsection (d) to read as follows:

                “ (d) An employer or employment agency shall not discriminate against an individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of or on the basis of the individual’s or a dependent’s reproductive health decision making, including a decision to use or access a particular drug, device or medical service, because of or on the basis of an employer’s personal beliefs about such services.”

                (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit any rights of an employee provided through any other provision of law or collective bargaining unit.

    Sec. 3.  Fiscal impact statement.
    The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the

    fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule
    Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

    Sec. 4.  Effective date.
                This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

     

    Comment

    Comment

    Dispelling confusion about DMV and REAL ID

    In the past week, there have been several reports regarding deadlines for D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to comply with a federal law known as REAL ID. Unclear information caused many D.C. residents to raise concerns that they would need to rush to the DMV to obtain a new REAL ID by a May 1, 2014 deadline.  Please note that this is not the case. Below we outline some key questions and answers.

    Do I need to get a new license or ID?

    Only if your license or ID is due to expire. Otherwise, your license or ID will remain valid for all purposes until its expiration date.

    Do I need to get a new ID before 2016 in order to board planes?

    Only if your ID is due to expire. Contrary to initial reports, all IDs issued by D.C. DMV will remain valid beyond 2016 if their expiration date is after 2016. If your license is due to expire in 2018, for example, you do not need to worry, and you can continue to use it for all purposes until it expires.

    Will DMV contact me about getting a new license?

    DMV will be contacting D.C. residents whose IDs are set to expire to inform them of the documentation they will need to bring with them to get a new license. Due to REAL ID implementation, no one will be able to renew licenses online until they get a REAL ID compliant ID. To renew your license or ID you will need to bring: proof of identity such as birth certificate or passport, proof of social security number such as a card or W-2 form, a green card or other proof of lawful presence in the United States, and two documents proving current residence in the District of Columbia from this list.

    More information can be found on DMV’s website.

    Comment

    Comment

    Advocates Rally In Support Of Repealing Prostitution Free Zones In D.C.

    By Sarah Anne Hughes on DCist, April 11, 2014

    More than a dozen people rallied outside the Wilson Building today to show support for a transgender woman of color who they say was targeted by police in Arizona and a bill being considered by the Council to repeal "prostitution free zones" in D.C.

    Monica Jones, a student at Arizona State University’s School of Social Work, was arrested in May 2013 by an undercover police officer for “manifesting prostitution" as part of Project ROSE, which, as Vice put it, arrests sex workers in the name of saving them. Jones' case goes to trial today.

    Friday's event, organized in part by HIPS (Helping Individual Prostitutes Survive), the D.C. Trans Coalition and Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, was held to raise awareness about Jones' case and the bill, said Elizabeth Saracco, direct of programs for HIPS. The bill, introduced by Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large), would repeal a nine-year-old "provision of the D.C. Code [that] permits the Metropolitan Police Department to declare a particular location as a prostitution free zone for a 20-day period." Once declared, "it is unlawful for a group of two or more persons to congregate in a public space or property in that area for the purpose of engaging in prostitution or prostitution-related offenses."

    "Police officers can then ask any group of two or more people who an officer 'reasonably believes' is in the prostitution free zone for the purpose of sex work to vacate the area," Grosso wrote in an op-ed for the Washington Blade. "If the people do not leave the area then they can be arrested."

    Saracco said "numerous" transgender woman of color have complained to HIPS about harassment by police in prostitution free zones — "that their lives have been made difficult." This has not been an issue for male or white sex workers, she said. A task force report prepared by the Anti-Defamation League for MPD echoed this: "The mistreatment of transgender individuals — and particularly transgender women of color — by police officers is among the most frequently cited and egregious examples of bias and misconduct."

    The law has also done little to actually reduce prostitution, Saracco said.

    "It's something that's been on my mind for quite awhile," Grosso said outside the Wilson Building today. "It just gave MPD an opportunity to discriminate in a way that I think is unjust."

    Grosso said he's been told by MPD that they aren't actually enforcing or implementing the law: "So it's really an opportunity for us to stand up and speak for something that's right and just."

    Kevin O'Connor, a Dupont Circle ANC commissioner, agrees and says he plans to write a resolution in support of Grosso's bill. His ANC previously passed a resolution opposing Councilmember Yvette Alexander's (D-Ward 7) legislation to allow police to create permanent prostitution free zones.

    "The Dupont Circle community is concerned about it," O'Connor said, citing the area's LGBT history.

    When asked if there's been pushback against the bill, Grosso said "not at this point."

    "I think it was a bad idea to start with, so they recognize that now, that it really is an easy way to violate someone's human rights," Grosso said. "So it's time to get ride of them, get them off the books."

    Comment