Comment

The Fair Leave Act of 2014

by Anne Robinson

This week, Councilmember Grosso along with Councilmembers Catania, McDuffie, and Wells  introduced the Fair Leave Act of 2014. The bill was referred to the Committee on Government Operations.  The intent is to provide government employees up to 6 weeks of paid leave in connection with the birth, adoption, or fostering of a child, or the care of a family member who has a serious medical condition.  By offering 6 weeks of paid leave for a government employee, we actively invest in families by supporting early childhood development, the health and welfare of residents, the retention of women in the workforce, and the vital role that parents play.  I think that 6 weeks of paid leave is a very small price to pay for outcomes that have such a diverse impact. 

Currently, the District of Columbia Family Medical Leave Act (D.C. FMLA) allows for all persons working for businesses with 50 employees or more to receive up to 16 weeks out of a continuous 24 month period of unpaid leave to care for a family member in the event of a birth, adoption, fostering, or illness.  A family member is a person related to the employee by blood, legal custody, or marriage; a child who lives with the employee; or a person with whom the employee has shared a home with in the same year. The D.C. FMLA unpaid leave allows for 4 weeks longer than the federal FMLA.  The definition of “family member” is inclusive and reflective of whom we label and identify as family here in the District.  The law includes safeguards for the employee’s position and benefits during a period of unpaid leave and also protects the interests of the employer. 

We believe that amending the D.C. Code to allow for 6 weeks of paid leave will have positive impacts on education, health and welfare, and human rights in our city. 

Education

Councilmember Grosso serves on the Committee on Education and he hears the testimony from parents and teachers alike about their concerns for the educational development of children.  He is also involved in analyzing the District’s need for universal pre-kindergarten programs that start as early as three years of age to ensure that we are reaching the children who are not getting basic skills at home that help them to be school-ready.  Studies have shown that beginning at birth, care-takers in the home foster the necessary development of communication, empathy, curiosity, creativity, and confidence.  These are just some of the fundamental traits that children need to develop prior to beginning pre-school and kindergarten programs.  When parents can nurture language and literacy starting from birth a child is better prepared both physically and emotionally when they enter school. When we provide parents with the tools they need to teach their children we set into motion foundations for a child’s future success.

Health

Councilmember Grosso also serves as a member on the Committees on Health.  From meetings with nurses, health care providers, and patient advocates we are constantly discussing ways that we can broaden and ease the recovery process for those who are ill and in need of care.  One way to do this is to offer paid leave for a new mother to stay at home with her infant child so that she can recover from the delivery without the fear of the financial burdens that an individual or family faces when they must take leave from work.   The average time to heal from the birth of child is 6 weeks, but that is under the best of circumstances.  Recovery from a surgical cesarean delivery, complications from the delivery, or post-partum depression can increase the need for leave time.  It is vital that our city provides high quality health care and assistance to low-income residents of the District who need it.   If a parent has to choose between working and staying home with a new child it can delay regular well-baby checks-ups or immunization schedules, which is a serious public health concern.  

Gender Roles and Balance

As gender roles in our society shift, the roles of men and women in the household are also changing.  Positions and opportunities for women in the workplace are evolving while at the same time women must strive to be perceived as equal to their male counterparts.  Women do not want to face employment setbacks for being pregnant or taking time off.  This legislation gives either parent the benefit of taking time off to care for a family member without the fear of lost positions or wages.  The legislation also promotes the necessary role that fathers and secondary caretakers play in their child’s development.  When the government supports fathers to stay home with a newborn, studies have shown that this solidifies their involvement in the long-term care of the child.  This bill acknowledges that not only is the man’s employment position or salary relevant, but also his involvement and concerns as a parent. We recognize that there is a great diversity of families and this bill is designed to be inclusive of all family structures.

Economics

The United States ranks second from the bottom, runner up to Pakistan, for paid maternity and paternity leave.  Norway and Canada top the paid leave charts with four months of paid government leave for both parents.  Even though our economic structure and system of government do not function the same way as these countries, it might be time to consider the economic benefits that can be gained from providing paid leave.  California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island all offer 6 weeks of paid leave for all employees, which is funded through a payroll tax.  The state of Washington passed paid leave legislation and is currently working on their budget for the program.  In July 2013, the U.S. Senate Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee approved a fiscal year 2014 spending measure that includes $5 million to support a new State Paid Leave Fund.  The fund will provide planning and implementation grants to states wishing to establish paid leave programs and provide benefits to workers who need to take time off for reasons covered under FMLA. 

Mayor Gray indicated in his State of District speech that he would also be introducing similar legislation that would allowed for 4 weeks paid leave for the primary caregiver and 2 weeks for the secondary caregiver.  These are all signs of progress and we hope the District of Columbia will be next on the list to offer a similar benefit. 

To offer District government employees 6 weeks of paid leave is economically sound.  By having this policy in place, we will attract more qualified employees to work here and we will encourage the mothers to return to the workplace.  By granting flexibly and time to recover and bond, parents will feel less pressure about their financial situation.  And by having parents who are able to stay at home with the concern of financial burdens lifted they will be able to focus on the child.  This concept loops us back to better public health, stronger families, and promoting the basic education and skills a child needs starting from birth to be healthy and school ready. 

*All posts are approved and endorsed by Councilmember Grosso.

Comment

Comment

Opengov Foundation & Washington, D.C. Office of Open Government Launch DCDecoded.org


Our Nation’s Capital Becomes America’s 5th ‘Open Law’ City with New Online Platform that Makes the District’s Laws Accessible and User-Friendly for All

WASHINGTON, DC (March 19, 2013) – The non-partisan, non-profit OpenGov Foundation and the Washington, D.C. Board of Ethics and Accountability’s Office of Open Government today announced the launch of DCdecoded.org, a free software platform that empowers all District residents to discover, access, and use local laws when they want, and how they want.  Washington, D.C. becomes the 5th “open law” city in the United States, joining the nationwide America Decoded network of user-friendly, online and restriction-free municipal and state legal codes.

 

Click Here to Access DCdecoded.org

“DCdecoded.org is a necessary resource for District residents” said Traci L. Hughes, director of the D.C. Office of Open Government.  “The value of a transparent government is limited unless the public has the ability to access, and easily navigate its laws.  Greater access will inevitably lead to more people becoming engaged with our lawmakers and the legislative process – and that is open government at its best.”

DCdecoded.org lifts and ‘liberates’ the District’s Municipal Code from unalterable, often hard to find online files —such as PDFs—by inserting them into user-friendly, organized and modern website formats.  This straightforward switch delivers significant results:  more clarity, context, and public understanding of the laws’ impact on D.C. citizens’ daily lives. For the first-time, DCdecoded.org allows unrestricted reuse of municipal laws and legal data by everyday residents so that they can use, share, and interact with it as they see fit. Simply, DCdecoded.org gives citizens the information they need, on their terms.    

“I am thrilled to finally have the District’s Municipal Code in a user-friendly format,” said D.C. Councilmember David Grosso.  “Residents will now be in a better position to engage with me and my colleagues on the D.C. Council because they will be able to understand how the laws we pass impact their lives on a daily basis. I am very impressed with the hard work of both the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability’s Office of Open Government and the OpenGov Foundation, who together made this possible here in our nation’s capital.”

As the website evolves to meet the growing needs of citizens, stakeholders, and government employees, D.C. residents will soon have access to municipal regulations at their fingertips in real-time.   Much like Google, DCdecoded.org offers the ability to search city existing and proposed laws by section, topic, and tags. 

DCdecoded.org and America Decoded network are powered by the The State Decoded, an open-source software platform and API used to display states’ law codes. The free platform was originally developed by Waldo Jaquith in 2010, thanks to a generous grant from the Knight Foundation.  The America Decoded network has since grown to include the legal codes of Maryland, Virginia, and Florida, as well as the municipal laws of Baltimore (MD), San Francisco (CA), Philadelphia (PA), Chicago (IL) with more states and cities in the process of joining.  Committed to using taxpayer dollars effectively and efficiently, the OpenGov Foundation and State Decoded teams have partnered to  ‘liberate’ the law online in every state, city and town in America…at absolutely no cost to taxpayers.

D.C. Office of Open Government, http://www.bega-dc.gov/office-open-government

The Open Government Office, an independent office within the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability, enforces the Open Meetings Act, monitors the District's Freedom of Information Act compliance and aids agencies with implementing open government practices.

CONTACT
Traci Hughes, Director
D.C. Office of Open Government
Email:
traci.hughes@dc.gov
Phone: (202) 481-3411

The OpenGov Foundation, http://opengovfoundation.org/

The OpenGov Foundation is dedicated to developing and deploying technologies that support every citizen's ability to participate in government, and hold it accountable. The State Decoded is a project launched by Waldo Jaquith and built upon by the OpenGov Foundation, both with funding by a grant from the Knight Foundation. 

CONTACT

Seamus Kraft, Executive Director

OpenGov Foundation

seamus@opengovfoundation.org

 

###


Comment

Comment

Oversight letter to the Department of Employment Services

In addition to posting our summaries of agency performance oversight hearings over the past weeks, we also want to share with you the follow-up oversight that happens in this process. After a hearing, Councilmembers often send letters to agencies with further questions. Here is Councilmember Grosso's letter to the D.C. Department of Employment Services, and the Office's response:

Comment

Comment

Oversight letter to Department of Small and Local Business Development

In addition to posting our summaries of agency performance oversight hearings over the past weeks, we also want to share with you the follow-up oversight that happens in this process. After a hearing, Councilmembers often send letters to agencies with further questions. Here is Councilmember Grosso's letter to the D.C. Department of Small and Local Business Development, and the Office's response:

Comment

Comment

Oversight letter to the Office of Motion Picture and Television Development

In addition to posting our summaries of agency performance oversight hearings over the past weeks, we also want to share with you the follow-up oversight that happens in this process. After a hearing, Councilmembers often send letters to agencies with further questions. Here is Councilmember Grosso's letter to the D.C. Office of Motion Picture and Television Development, and the Office's response:

Comment

Comment

Oversight letter to Department of Parks and Recreation

In addition to posting our summaries of agency performance oversight hearings over the past weeks, we also want to share with you the follow-up oversight that happens in this process. After a hearing, Councilmembers often send letters to agencies with further questions. Here is Councilmember Grosso's letter to the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Department's response, and David's follow-up letter:

Comment

Comment

Oversight letter to D.C. Taxicab Commission

In addition to posting our summaries of agency performance oversight hearings over the past weeks, we also want to share with you the follow-up oversight that happens in this process. After a hearing, Councilmembers often send letters to agencies with further questions. Here is Councilmember Grosso's letter to the D.C. Taxicab Commission and the Commission's response:

Comment

Comment

Performance Oversight Hearings Week in Review March 3-7, 2014

Last week was supposed to conclude the D.C. Council oversight hearings, but thanks to the snow days there will be a couple more scattered through the rest of the month. The schedule was not quite as packed as the week before, but it was still challenging to keep up with every hearing when so many happen at the same time. Councilmember Grosso hustled between hearings by the Committee of the Whole, Committee on Education, and Committee on Health. This is our latest recap—be sure to check out our write-ups for the weeks of February 17th and February 24th.

 

Quote of the Week:

Public Witness from Americans for Safe Access: “There are no known instances of overdosing on marijuana, and as a Maryland physician testified, you would have to smoke a joint the size of a telephone pole for that to happen.”

 

The  Committee of the Whole wrapped up its oversight hearings last week with testimony about the Contract Appeals Board, District of Columbia Retirement Board, Retiree Health Contribution, Teacher’s Retirement System, Police Officer’s and Firefighter’s Retirement System, Office of Zoning, and the Office of Planning.

  • Councilmember Grosso was splitting his time between the Committee of the Whole hearing and the Committee on Health hearing happening at the same time.  He heard testimony from and asked questions of Marc Loud, Chief Administrative Judge of the Contract Appeals Board (CAB).  The CAB hears both appeals (i.e., adversarial proceedings wherein either the government or a contractor under an existing contract initiate a lawsuit for damages for breach of contract performance or payment) and they hear protests (i.e., adversarial proceedings wherein a disappointed bidder challenges a contract award or solicitation).   The D.C. government is always a named party in either type of appeal because all of the cases have government contracts at issue.
  • The three recently appointed CAB Judges inherited a backlog of 41 cases and for those of you who are unfamiliar with this type of work…that is a lot.  The Judges and their staff narrowed this number down to six legacy cases without creating a second generation of backlog appeals.
  • All of the Judges and staff attorneys (five in total) are barred and in good legal standing in the District.  We wish this was not a question we had to ask, but with the current climate of not-so-good government it is important that the awkward questions get asked, too.
  • There were over thirty witnesses who came to testify about the the Office of Zoning (OZ) and the Office of Planning (OP) prior to the government witnesses.  Most of the public witnesses testified about the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Regulation Revisions (ZRR) The ZRR is roughly 1,000 pages of changes and edits meant to bring the regulations into the 21st century.   After more than five years of hearings on the revisions, we are starting to feel like by the time it is complete it will be time to start all over again. 
  • With the government’s loss of our former city planner, Harriet Tregoning, the Office of Planning is moving ahead with its plans (no pun intended?) for the city and to continue to accomplish new development while still preserving the city’s historic character.  The Councilmember was not able to stay for the government witness testimony, but his position on the matter is documented in our blog post from last year.  

 

The Committee on Education also held its final performance oversight hearing last week, with the DC Public Charter School Board (PCSB).

  • The PCSB has definitely stepped up its oversight of school discipline policies over the past year and as a result the expulsion and out of school suspension rates are down. While all were pleased with this news, the PCSB said they would look more closely at mid-year withdrawals to ensure that students are not being “counseled out” in lieu of expulsion. Councilmember Grosso asked the PCSB to take a closer look at their preschool school discipline policies. In data provided to the Committee by the PCSB, some charters schools are suspending students in PK-3 and PK-4. Why would a school ever need to suspend a child that young?
  • The PCSB recently redeveloped its Performance Management Framework (PMF) tool that helps schools disaggregate their data by subgroups to see where they are falling short in terms of the annual evaluation.
  • It does not seem like the PCSB will be working in collaboration with D.C. Public Schools (DCPS) anytime soon to ensure that new charter schools are not opening up right down the street from a DCPS school. Let the competition continue, we guess. Though is that really the most efficient use of taxpayer dollars?
  • There seems to be some inconsistency between school evaluations conducted by PCSB and the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE). The PCSB closed one school for poor performance rating under the PMF that was labeled as a “Reward” school (highest ranking a school can achieve) by OSSE. This isn’t a good situation but there is no obvious resolution right now.

 

Our week ended spending a lot of time with the Committee on Health on various agency performance oversight hearings.

Department of Behavioral Health

  • From recovering addicts, to rehabilitated former criminals, to survivors of the 1977 Hanafi siege of the Wilson Building, this hearing was filled with very impassioned testimony.  Many public witnesses praised DBH’s Certified Peer Specialist Program which they touted as life-changing and extremely effective.
  • Councilmember Grosso noted that the depression rate among African-American women is estimated to be almost 50% higher than that of Caucasian women and inquired about the Department’s efforts to reduce the stigma and market its services to this demographic.  DBH said they are addressing this disparity, for example with a program for young mothers who are TANF recipients, and continuing to try to increase access points for communities of color.
  • Concerned about the issues facing our homeless residents, Councilmember Grosso asked DBH what they are doing to cut down the wait times (25.1 months) for consumers to access housing.  DBH received 1,068 Housing Waiting List applications from consumers self-reporting as homeless in FY13. Director Baron noted that this area is a challenge due to extremely low supply of affordable housing in the face of high demand.  Currently, DBH offers 1,600 affordable housing units paid for with DHCD capital funds.  Although the waiting list does continue to grow, DBH is actively working with DHCD through monthly calls to address this issue.
  • Despite the high number of District residents who receive healthcare through Managed Care Organizations (MCOs), DBH has no full time employees dedicated to working directly with MCOs. However, the Department does frequently collaborate with DHCF to address issues around behavioral health treatment within the MCOs. We are going to keep a close eye on this topic, including during the budget process.

 

Department of Healthcare Finance

  • If you care about domestic policy, you always need to follow the money involved in healthcare. In FY13, DHCF spent nearly $2.3 billion to implement both Medicaid and Alliance programs. The entire budget of the District of Columbia is about $6 billion. DHCF’s Medicaid Managed Care program is the single largest item on the agency budget covering over 160,000 beneficiaries, via managed care organizations (MCOs).
  • For the first time ever, DHCF released a performance report for the MCOs (http://dhcf.dc.gov/node/775862). This information will inform DHCF decisions regarding contract renewal.  Councilmember Grosso has been pushing for more oversight of MCO spending and outcomes and this is a welcome first step.
  • It’s clear the agency is learning from past mistakes. Currently, MCOs are required to have a risk-based capital level ratio of about 1.50, which ensures that the MCO has reserves to pay for services that have been provided but not yet reimbursed. When Committee Chairwoman Alexander asked Director Turnage why there was a requirement, Turnage’s response was simple: “To avoid what happened with Chartered.”
  • Much of the growth in spending can be attributed to the long-term care program which has had year-to-year growth rates of more than six times the levels observed for the entire Medicaid program over the same period in the last few years. You have maybe heard of the Medicaid fraud investigation?
  • Speaking of which, the federal fraud investigations for the Personal Care Attendant program has required DHCF to suspend payments for 52% of home health providers, which covers about 79% of the beneficiaries. DHCF is working to ensure that this doesn’t mean people lack access to necessary medical services.
  • One of the greatest concerns raised during this hearing centered on the Elderly & Persons with Disabilities Medicaid Waiver program.  Many witnesses testified that waivers have been wrongly terminated rendering them unable to recertify for months at a time, worsening their conditions.

 

Department of Health

  • BIG NEWS on medical marijuana: Director Garcia testified that as a physician he does not believe there should be a list of qualifying conditions for medical marijuana and that it should be a decision solely between the patient and their doctor. No other regulation requires this kind of pre-clearance from the Department of Health of physicians. We look forward to having Director Garcia’s support in moving D.C. law and regulations to that goal.
  • DOH has funding ($200K) to provide local farmer’s markets with matching funds for low-income residents who use EBT cards to purchase fresh produce. DOH is working to get that money distribute to local markets before the farmer’s market season starts in April.
  • High school students from the Young Women’s Project testified on the Wrap MC peer educator program on sexual health, sponsored by HIV/AIDS, STI, Tuberculosis Administration at the Department of Health. Students recommended some type of sexual health and education program be available beginning in middle school. DOH reported they are in conversations with DCPS about similar Wrap MC programs in middle school. Please don’t clutch your pearls at this idea. Believe it or not, the average age of sexual debut in the District is between 11 and 12 years old, and these young people need to know how to protect themselves and be safe.
  • While the infant mortality rate is on the decline in D.C., there are a couple of Wards where the rate is as high as 12%--double the national rate of 6%. Most of these patients are insured, which is most troubling.

Comment

Comment

Performance Oversight Hearings Week in Review February 24-28, 2014

The week of February 24-28, 2014 was an epic one for agency performance oversight hearings at the D.C. Council. Councilmember Grosso set out to attend every oversight hearing for the committees where he is a member—there were 12 hearings, addressing 29 government agencies. We covered all those hearings plus monitored a couple others! Like last week, what follows is a presentation of key moments from some of those hearings.

Quote of the week:

"There are two critical attributes for gaining employment with the Washington Aqueduct—have a fundamental understanding of the pH scale and understand why water is wet.” --Washington Aqueduct General Manager Thomas Jacobus. If that’s you, check out their job openings!

 

Committee on Education

Councilmember Grosso and staff were kept busiest by the Committee on Education, with three days of hearings centered on the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) and D.C. Public Schools (DCPS). Two Washington Post articles helped set the agenda on the management of D.C. TAG (Tuition Assistance Grants, for D.C. students who go to state universities outside the District) and DCPS budget reprogramming of capital funds, published immediately prior to the respective hearings. You have to appreciate when the fourth estate also takes on an oversight role, right? Read on for some additional highlights from the hearings.

Office of the State Superintendent of Education

  • High school students who volunteer with the Young Woman’s Project were back this year to testify on the need for D.C. to update its health and sexual education curriculum. “Sexuality is taught where straightness is the norm and anything else is an aberration,” one student testified. The Committee will include language in the FY15 Budget Support Act to ask OSSE to report on the status of health curriculum revisions by October 1.
  • There was a spirited discussion about a little known change regarding student eligibility for free and reduced meals (FARM) that may have an impact on student achievement data. Last year, many D.C. schools moved to “community eligibility” for FARM meaning that if at least 40% of students at a school met the income eligibility requirements for FARM, then the entire school does. The tension arises when FARM data points are also used for student achievement. At schools like Hardy MS where just over 40% of students are FARM eligible, the other 60% of students are now being counted as such. Committee Chairman Catania suggested that this “community eligibility” distinction could distort our student achievement growth data.
  • Speaking of student achievement growth, OSSE agreed to post online all of the school improvement plans that have been approved under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers. It takes a community to turn around a school, so why not let everyone know what we’re working towards. Be on the lookout for those on the OSSE website soon.
  • There needs to be a complete overhaul of the teacher licensure system. Can you believe everything is still paper-based?! Only four people work in the OSSE licensure division and it takes about 8-10 weeks to get approved, which is entirely too long in our opinion.

D.C. Public Schools

  • If you’re a parent looking at schools, you might want to compare DCPS and public charter schools side by side. Once upon a time, DCPS tried to create a common school rating system with the public charter school sector. Unfortunately, the two could not come to an agreement. So there are two systems, and no plans to try again for a unified metric. Which is a shame.
  • We are just months away from the expiration of our federal Race to the Top (RTTT) grant and DCPS still hasn’t implemented any turnaround plans under RTTT because they have not been able to receive approval from OSSE to spend the funds in time. Yes, let this knowledge marinate for a second. Millions of dollars are going unspent. But since OSSE committed to post the plans online soon, which implies they must be approved, this ball should finally be rolling.
  • Just before the hearing, the Chancellor and the Mayor released the reprogramming of funding for modernization at schools which had some major “winners” and “losers.” The Chancellor sought to clarify some decisions. She first reported that Payne ES modernization dollars had been restored. Garrison ES was removed from Phase I modernization because the Mayor decided to do a full modernization for Garrison in FY15. The Chancellor also noted that there could be more changes to capital improvement plans to address some critical Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violations at schools like Banneker HS, as pointed out by Councilmember Grosso. Going forward, all Phase I school modernizations will address ADA compliance issues.
  • Councilmember Grosso asked Chancellor Henderson about the continuity of leaders and whether the one-year contracts for school administrators is helping or hindering DCPS keep its effective leaders. The Chancellor reported that she is conversations with the CSO (school leader union) about 3-year contracts for school leaders. A BIG move if they can get it to work.
  • Not everyone likes the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s new healthy nutrition standards for school lunch. Participation rates across DCPS are down because the food isn’t as flavorful. Councilmember Grosso noted that they should consider food trucks—turns out that’s what some of the students have been asking for.

We are certainly looking forward to the Mayor’s FY15 budget to see how DCPS better equalizes the rigor and programming across its middle schools and education campuses. The big money question: is it OK for some more advanced courses like Algebra I to have 3 or 4 students in a classroom, or should those courses be cut?

 

Committee of the Whole

Oversight hearings by the Committee of the Whole covered eight different agencies! However, the Office of Contracts and Procurement had just recently had a hearing, and several other agencies are multi-jurisdictional, so the bulk of energy was put into oversight of the University of the District of Columbia (UDC) and the UDC Community College.  The oversight hearing—covering UDC, the community college, and the law school—was a marathon, clocking in at over six hours.

  • One hurdle that Councilmember Grosso discussed with UDC President Lyons was how the institution can overcome the barriers that it faces for Middle States Accreditation. To that end, UDC recognizes that it must take action to implement its Vision 20/20 Plan, so that it can operate less as a government agency and more like an independent higher education institution. 
  • There was the robust discussion about dual eligibility and how the college plans to engage with DCPS and public charter schools to get our resident students into early college prep courses to earn both high school and college credits. 
  • Another hot topic was retention and graduation rates--UDC currently retains and graduates only about 16% of the students that enroll at the school.  We do not know the percentages of students who transfer out to other institutions or leave higher education altogether.  The University is beginning to track these students better as well as develop plans for retaining more students. 

Although there is a lot of work to be done, the focus and the energy are clearly shifting at UDC from a survival mode mentality to one that is more about thriving and future growth. 

 

Committee on Health

D.C. Office on Aging

  • As part of their FY13 performance goals, D.C. Office on Aging planned to reach 55% of District employees seeking employment through job training and placement but only reached 26.5%. this was due in part to that the tight current job market, where seniors are competing with recent college graduates and grad school alum for the same positions.  Another Office initiative was a collaboration with Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to educate seniors about financial abuse and fraud. In response to a question from Councilmember Grosso, the Office on Aging said they are actively addressing issues affecting LGBT seniors and have members of their senior advisory board from the LGBT community.

Deputy Mayor of Health and Human Services

  • Councilmember Grosso asked the Deputy Mayor of Health and Human Services about the little-known fact that the Gray administration changed emergency shelters from being open year-round to only during hypothermia season. This might be part of why D.C. General had such a crunch this winter, among other factors. David also made it clear that he believes D.C. should be helping anyone who is homeless in the city, rather than focusing efforts on additional measures to verify District residency for those seeking shelter.

 

Committee for Transportation and the Environment

Another wide-ranging set of agencies were up before the Transportation and the Environment Committee for oversight hearings.

Department of Environment

  • Public witnesses testifying about Department of Environment (DDOE) echoed Councilmember Grosso’s desire to swim in the Anacostia, alleging that the swimming ban should be removed in certain parts of the river where kayaking and other water activities already take place. Director Anderson was not convinced, but said they would look into the subject, while erring on the side of safety. Additionally:
  • DDOE has finalized storm water regulations—related in part to the green river infrastructure discussed by DC Water (see below), who they are collaborating with on continued clean-up of the Anacostia.
  • DDOE planted over 8,000 trees in the District in FY13, exceeding original targets by almost 100%.
  • Under a contract with DDOE, DC Sustainable Energy Utility (DCSEU) is tasked with promoting energy efficiency, but has been failing to meet its benchmarks. DDOE is reviewing the contract and considering changes to be made.

Director Anderson stated that priorities for the coming year include implementing the Mayor’s Sustainable D.C. plan, the health of the Anacostia River, and working to resolve issues with the DCSEU.

DC Water & Washington Aqueduct

  • With two-thirds of District sewer overflows dumping into the Anacostia and Potomac, DC Water is working to accelerate its green infrastructure initiative. DC Water and Department of Transportation are exploring which is agency is best suited to implement this initiative, known as the Clean Rivers Project. Remaining challenges notwithstanding, public witness Marchant Wentworth remembered when “condoms were gently flowing out of combined sewer tunnels.”  We’ve come a long way.
  • According to General Manager Thomas Jacobus of the oft-forgotten Washington Aqueduct, the District’s water quality is just as good if not better than any other local jurisdiction.  All water analysis testing will be completed by the end of the month.

Department of Motor Vehicles

  • Big news for the Department of Motor Vehicles when April turns to May--the Georgetown Service Center is scheduled to reopen on April 29, while new driver’s licenses under the D.C. Driver’s Safety Amendment Act will launch May 1, 2014. Don’t plan to get your new license on May Day, however, as due to the large number of residents expected to apply, they will be available by appointment only.
  • In other facilities news, DMV Director Lucinda Babers said that Brentwood Road Test Center “sucks,” and she is working with Department of General Services to identify another location for road testing.
  • Tips for the “wrongly” ticketed: If ever you should receive a parking ticket that you wish to contest, DMV wants you to know that you should NOT pay the ticket first.  Paying the ticket is basically an admission of guilt.  To resolve the matter, contest the ticket.  If you lose and seek to appeal, you must then pay the ticket along with the appeal fee.  If you win on appeal, you will be refunded.

Department of Public Works

  • Bet you didn’t see this coming--due to the heavy snowfall this winter, Department of Public Works has busted their snow budget, going $2 million over their $6.2 million budget. DPW is working with the Budget Office to reallocate additional funds. But even $8 million isn’t enough to get every D.C. street clear of snow after heavy storms, which DPW is trying to address by improving communications among plow drivers and zone captains. Will Spring ever come?
  • When residents aren’t complaining about snow, they’re griping about parking, and DPW indicated that parking enforcers are beginning to take more photos to reduce “keying errors.” Yes, photos! DPW stated that if a parking officer has a high ticket challenge rate they are likely writing bad tickets and the Director will address it.

 

Committee on Business and Consumer Regulatory Affairs

Over 90 people showed up to testify before the Committee on Business and Consumer Regulatory Affairs oversight hearing regarding  four major agencies—Department of Employment Services, Department of Small and Local Business Development, Workforce Investment Council and the Office of Motion Picture and Television Development. Here are some key moments:

  • The majority of attendees spoke about the need for the Chairman and the Council to secure the necessary funding in the budget to fulfill the promise of the new minimum wage and paid sick and safe leave laws. 
  • Councilmember Grosso used his allotted time to question the Department of Employment Services (DOES) Interim Director, Tom Luparello.  His primary focus was to ascertain the metrics used by the Department to measure the performance of their employees and the programs and services that they provide.  Historically, the Office of Program and Performance Monitoring has been understaffed with an underspent budget—we think that is a serious problem for the office that oversees the implementation of policies, procedures, and metrics. Director Luparello stated that they are working on getting this office properly staffed.  He also mentioned that he reviews reports of employees and programs on a daily basis.  It is his goal to review every program and office at DOES to determine and rate performance levels.
  • One positive crossover from the Committee of the Whole oversight hearing for the UDC Community College and DOES is that apparently both groups are working together to find better avenues for improving workforce development needs and funding. 

 

Committee on Finance and Revenue

The Finance and Revenue Committee heard from the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO) about its latest efforts to prevent and identify fraud. OCFO established the Office of Integrity Oversight to monitor internal controls along with a new Chief Risk Officer.Additionally, OCFO has tightened hiring standards for the Office and is committed to changing company culture to foster a positive work environment because changing attitudes is the first step to decreasing fraud and company waste.

 

Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety

Although Councilmember Grosso is not a member of the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, we try to keep up with the happenings there due to our commitment to improving the criminal justice system in the District. The oversight hearing on coordination of emergency responses by the Office of Unified Communications (OUC), the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department (FEMS), and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) brought out a number of interesting points regarding recent high profile agency failures.

Fire and Emergency Medical Services

  • FEMS protocol is that every patient must be assessed. In a tragic case where a man died after an ambulance responding to the call said they were “waved off by MPD,” this policy clearly states that they should have responded regardless of MPD actions. Nonetheless, as noted by one union leader, a protocol shouldn’t replace the basic instinct of compassion that is vital to working in the public safety field.
  • The conversation kept returning to issues of dispatch, and how dispatch decisions are made. There was not clarity on whether FEMS has a policy prohibiting self-dispatching (such as an ambulance stopping to help someone who hails them when not already on a call), although under the previous fire chief one employee was allegedly fired for self-dispatching. A former oversight officer for FEMS testified, seeking whistleblower protection, about a number of failures at the agency, including a faulty dispatch priority decision making system. He described witnessing a police officer hit by a car across the street from his station, but then being dispatched to reset a fire alarm in a nearby building while a team from another neighborhood was sent to help the officer. He also outlined other problems from credentialing to medication supplies to lack of oversight within the agency.

Metropolitan Police Department

We looked forward to the oversight hearing for the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) after the recent release of the Hate Crimes Assessment Task Force report as well as the conversations in the city about racial disparities in arrests and marijuana law reform. A few advocates made important testimony and Chief Lanier answered several rounds of questions from Committee Chairman Wells.

  • An ACLU investigation of police complaint processes found that only four in ten police stations kept complaint forms for the Office of Police Complaints, while their inquiries about how to file a complaint against an officer frequently elicited hostile and factually inaccurate responses from officers. This testimony contrasted starkly with Chief Lanier’s later testimony that the best way to improve police interactions with transgender residents is for people to make complaints. Indeed, she testified that the best way to address officer misconduct across the board is by filing reports.
  • Conflicts between bicyclists and car drivers, and associated safety concerns, continue to be an issue for advocates like Washington Area Bicycle Association. While WABA and others suggested that increased enforcement of bicycle laws might help but also emphasized that bicyclists are not the only ones that flout the laws, and encouraged any increase in enforcement to be applied fairly across transportation modes. Chief Lanier rejected suggestions that MPD officers might treat bicyclists less favorably than motorists.
  • On the topic of the Hate Crimes Assessment Task Force report, Chief Lanier recognized that the transition of the Gay and Lesbian Liaison Unit (GLLU) was not done well. While she agreed that it was rushed and therefore not properly executed, she stood by her decision to decentralize the unit. Chief Lanier also acknowledged that MPD needs stronger training for affiliate members of the GLLU. Although the report documented a steady increase in hate crimes, including against LGBT community, from 2008 to 2011, Chief Lanier testified that hate crimes have gone down in the previous two year. There is still no consensus on whether this reflects actual crime patterns, reporting patterns, or an unclear mix of the two.
  • In response to questions from Committee Chairman Wells about racial disparities in marijuana arrests, Chief Lanier said that racial disparities are nothing new in drug arrests. She further stated that the report from the Washington Committee of Lawyers for Civil Rights on race and marijuana arrests used bad data—data that came from MPD. According to Chief Lanier, 911 calls are what lead to drug arrests. In 2013, MPD received 12 calls regarding marijuana use in Ward 3 versus 500+ in Ward 7, partially explaining racial disparities according to the Chief.

 

Comment

Comment

Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014

Councilmember Tommy Wells                   Councilmember David Grosso

 Councilmember Mary M. Cheh                 Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie

 

A BILL

 

_______________

 

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

_______________

 

Councilmembers Grosso, Wells, Cheh, and McDuffie introduced the following bill, which was

referred to the Committee on                                                 .

 

To amend Section 1-1001.08 of the District of Columbia Official Code to require all candidates for elected office to obtain a “clean hands” certification from the Office of Campaign Finance prior to obtaining ballot access for any election. 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this

act may be cited as the “Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014”.

            Sec. 2. Definitions.

For the purposes of this act, the term:

(1) “Ballot access” means the conditions under which a candidate or political party is either entitled to stand for election or to appear on voters’ ballots.
            (2)  “Campaign” means any organized effort to influence the vote of District residents affiliated with a candidate.

(3)  “Clean Hands” means free from debt; owing no outstanding taxes, fines, fees or the equivalent to local or federal officials.

Sec. 3. Clean Hands Certification.

Section 1-1001.08 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended by adding subsection (t) to read as follows:

“(a) In addition to the qualifications of candidates outlined in this section, each candidate for election to the office of Mayor, Attorney General, Chairman of the Council, member of the Council, or member of the Board of Education, must first obtain a clean hands certification from the Office of Campaign Finance prior to obtaining ballot access for any election. This certification shall provide that:

            (1) The candidate owes no outstanding taxes, fines or fees to the District.

            (2) The candidate’s previous campaign or political committee owes no outstanding fines or fees to the District.

Sec. 4.  Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the

fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule
Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

Sec. 5.  Effective date.
            This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(2)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

Comment

2 Comments

Instant Runoff Voting Amendment Act of 2014

                                                           

Councilmember David Grosso

 

 

A BILL

                   

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

                            

 

Councilmember Grosso introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on __________________________.

                                                            .

 

To provide for the election of the Mayor, Members of Council, and the Attorney General using instant runoff voting, to require that District voting systems be compatible with an instant runoff ballot system, and setting a date and conditions for implementation.

            BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Instant Runoff Voting Amendment Act of 2014”.

 

Sec. 2. Definitions.

            For the purposes of this act, the term:

(1)   “Instant runoff voting,” also called “ranked choice voting,” means a method of

casting and tabulating votes whereby the voters rank candidates according to the order of their choice and counting proceeds in rounds in which candidates are eliminated. In every round, each ballot is counted as one vote for the highest ranked advancing candidate.

(2)   “Continuing candidate” means a candidate who has not been eliminated.

(3)   “Continuing ballot” means a ballot that is not deemed an exhausted ballot.

(4)   “Exhausted ballot” means a ballot that does not rank any continuing candidate,

contains an overvote at the highest continuing ranking or contains two or more sequential skipped rankings before its highest continuing ranking.

            Sec. 3. Instant Runoff Voting.

            Chapter 10 of Title 1 of the District of Columbia Official Code is amended by adding the new section 1-1001.08(b) to read as follows:

            “1-1001.08(b). Instant Runoff Elections.

            “(a) The Mayor, Attorney General, Chairman and members of the Council shall be elected using a ranked choice, or “instant runoff” ballot in both the primary and in the general election.

            “(b) In each primary and general election for the office of Mayor, Attorney General, Chairman and member of the Council:

                        “(1) The ballot shall allow voters to rank candidates in order of preference equal to the total number of candidates for each office; provided, however if the voting system, vote tabulation system or similar or related equipment used by the District cannot feasibly accommodate choices equal to the total number of candidates running for office, then the Board of Elections may limit the number of choices a voter may rank to no fewer than three. The ballot shall allow voters to rank a write-in candidate. A voter may include no more than one write-in candidate among that voter’s ranked choices for each office.

                        “(2) For election to a single office, tabulation proceeds in rounds and the following procedure is used. In each round, each continuing ballot must be counted as one vote for its highest ranked continuing candidate. If more than two continuing candidates receive votes in a round, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and a new round begins. If two or fewer continuing candidates receive votes in a round, the candidate with the most votes is elected.

                        “(3) For election to more than one office, the following procedure is used. Tabulation proceeds in rounds. In each round, each continuing ballot must be counted as one vote for its highest ranked continuing candidate. If the number of continuing candidates is greater than one more than the number of offices to be elected, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and a new round begins. If the number of continuing candidates is equal to or less than one more than the number of offices to be elected, the candidates with the most votes are elected.

                        “(4) Optionally where appropriate, during the Board’s tabulation of results, two or more candidates may be eliminated simultaneously by batch elimination.  Batch elimination may only occur if in any round there is a candidate who’s vote total plus the vote totals of all candidates with an equal number or fewer votes is less than the vote total of the candidate with the next higher vote total. Under those conditions, then that candidate and all candidates with an equal number or fewer votes in the current round may be simultaneously eliminated.

                        “(5) If all the choices indicated on a voter’s ballot have been eliminated, that ballot shall be deemed an exhausted ballot.

                        “(6) If a ranked-choice ballot gives equal rank to two or more candidates, the ballot shall be declared an exhausted ballot when such multiple rankings are reached.

                        “(7) If a voter cases a ranked-choice ballot but skips a rank, the voter’s vote shall be added to the totals of that voter’s next ranked choice.

                        “(8) A tie between two or more candidates shall be resolved pursuant to D.C. Official Code § 1-1001.10(c).

            “(c) The ballot must be simple and easy to understand and allow a voter to rank candidates for an office in order of choice. If feasible, ballots must be designed so that a voter may mark that voter’s first choices in the same manner as that for offices not elected by instant runoff voting. Instructions on the ballot must conform substantially to the following specifications, subject to usability testing and modification based on ballot design and voting machine: “Vote by indicating your first-choice candidate and ranking additional candidates in order of preference. Indicate your first choice by marking the number “1” beside a candidate’s name, your 2nd choice by marking the number “2” beside a candidate’s name, your 3rd choice by marking the number “3” beside a candidate’s name and so on. Rank as many choices as you wish. Indicating 2nd and later preferences will not count against your first choice. Do not skip numbers, and do not mark the same number beside more than one candidate.”

            “(d) The Board of Election shall conduct a voter education campaign to familiarize voters with instant runoff voting. Sample ballots illustrating “instant runoff” voting procedures shall be posted in or near the voting booth, and shall be included in the instruction packed for absentee ballots.

            “(e) Any voting system, vote tabulation system, or similar or related equipment acquired by the District shall be capable to administer instant runoff voting without further modifications.

“(f) Instant runoff voting shall be used for the primary municipal election in 2016 and all subsequent elections. If the Board of Elections certifies to the Mayor and the Council no later than November 1, 2015 that the Board will not be ready to implement ranked-choice balloting in 2016, then the District shall begin using ranked-choice or “instant runoff” balloting at the immediate next municipal election, including special elections.”

Sec. 5. Effect on Rights of Political Parties.

For all statutory and charter provisions in the District pertaining to the rights of political parties, the number of votes cast for a party’s candidate for an office elected by a ranked choice or instant runoff method is the number of votes credited to that candidate after the initial round of counting.

Sec. 6. Rules.

            Within 120 days of the effective date of this act the Mayor shall, pursuant to title I of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, approved October 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1204; D.C. Official Code  §  2-501 et seq.), issue rules to implement the provisions of this act.

Sec. 7.  Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the

fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule
Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

Sec. 8.  Effective date.
            This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

2 Comments

Comment

Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014

                                                                                                                                                           

Councilmember David Catania                                               Councilmember David Grosso

                                                                                                                                                    

Councilmember Tommy Wells                                                Councilmember Mary M. Cheh

                                                            

   Councilmember David Grosso  

 

A BILL

             

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

                              

Councilmembers Grosso, Catania, Wells, Cheh, and Evans introduced the following bill, which

was referred to the Committee on _________________________________                                         .

To amend the District of Columbia Election Code of 1955 to provide that a qualified voter shall

have the right to change his or her party affiliation after the 30th day preceding an

election and on election day.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL FO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014”.

 Sec. 2. Section 7(g) of the District of Columbia Election Code of 1955, approved August 12, 1955 (69 Stat. 702; D.C. Official Code § 1-1001.07(g)), is amended as follows:

(a) Paragraph (4) is amended by striking the phrase "A qualified elector shall not change his or her party affiliation after the 30th day preceding an election." in its entirety.

(b) Paragraph (5) is amended by striking the phrase "A qualified elector shall not change his or her party affiliation on election day." in its entirety.

Sec. 3. Fiscal impact statement.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule
Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

Sec. 4.  Effective date.
            This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(2)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

Comment

1 Comment

Grosso's Elections Reform Package to Boost Voter Turnout

For Immediate Release: 

March 4, 2014

Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

(202) 724-8105

Today, Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) introduced an elections reform package in an effort to allow more residents to engage and participate in the democratic process. The legislation includes the "Instant Runoff Voting Amendment Act of 2014," the "Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014," and the "Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014."

The "Instant Runoff Voting Amendment Act of 2014" would provide a method of casting and tabulating votes whereby voters would be able to rank candidates in the order of their choice and the candidates with the least number of votes would be eliminated. 

"It is extremely troubling that candidates can be elected to public office with as little as 30 percent of the vote," said Grosso.  "This important legislation will increase voter turnout as voters will be free to mark their ballot for the candidate that they truly prefer without fear that their choice will help elect their least preferred candidate. More importantly, instant runoff voting ensures that the elected candidate has a true majority support."

Grosso introduced the "Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014" highlighting that the District has a growing number of Independent voters that identify with neither the Republican nor the Democratic Party.  According to the D.C. Board of Elections, in 2003, there were a little over 50,000 Independent voters and today, almost 76,000 District voters identify as such, yet these voters do not have the opportunity to vet candidates for public office through the primary process.

This legislation would allow qualified registered voters the opportunity to change their party affiliation through Election Day. 

Finally, the "Clean Hands Elections Reform Amendment Act of 2014" would require candidates seeking elected office in D.C. to receive certification from the Office of Campaign Finance that neither the candidate nor any of the candidate's previous campaigns or political committees owe any outstanding taxes, fines or fees to the District prior to receiving ballot access.

"By requiring candidates to certify that they have 'clean hands' when it comes to their prior campaigns, we will encourage our candidates to be more attentive to the elections and campaign finance rules," said Grosso.

Grosso will continue to push for residents to become more engaged in the political process. During his first year in office, he introduced the "Public Financing of Political Campaigns Amendment Act of 2013" and more recently the "Local Resident Voting Rights Act of 2013."

       ###

1 Comment

Comment

Grosso Calls for New Approach to Improve Relationship between MPD and the Transgender Community

For Immediate Release: 

 February 27, 2014

Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

(202) 724-8105

 

Washington, D.C. - Today, Councilmember David Grosso (At Large-I) issued the following statement regarding the recently released report by the Hate Crimes Assessment Task Force written by the Anti-Defamation League on the Metropolitan Police Department's (MPD) programs in support of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community:  

The report released yesterday on relations between MPD and the LGBT community is an important step toward improving public safety in our city. While I think the recommendations are sensible and Chief Lanier should act on them quickly, I was concerned in particular with one of the findings. It is upsetting that our transgender residents continue to have extremely negative interactions with MPD, despite MPD having some of the best LGBT policies in the country.

Another concern after reading the report was that the findings and recommendations on improving safety for transgender residents did not mention the policing of commercial sex. The report noted that transgender women (African-Americans and Latinas in particular), express that MPD regularly views and treats them as criminals. This might be as much a result of legal policies as it is a result of police bias.

Just as we are reconsidering our drug laws, which have been found to be discriminatory, I think it is time that we open up the conversation regarding how we handle commercial sex.  We need to consider changing from a framework of criminalization to a framework that emphasizes the health and human rights of those involved. I look forward to having serious conversations about these topics with my constituents and my colleagues.

       ###

 

Comment

Comment

D.C. official faces questions about D.C. TAG audit

By Emma Brown, The Washington Post

D.C. Council members on Monday quizzed State Superintendent of Education Jesús Aguirre about an unreleased audit showing that city officials cannot account for nearly $10 million in federal taxpayer dollars meant for a tuition assistance program that helps D.C. students pay for college.

The audit, first reported by The Washington Post, also describes weak internal controls at Aguirre’s agency, the Office of the State Superintendent of Education, which manages the D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant program, known as D.C. TAG.

Aguirre described the audit, dated Sept. 30, 2013, as a draft with findings that are premature. But he acknowledged that he and other officials have not figured out how much money should be in TAG’s accounts.

“What I’m hearing is that you really aren’t going to be able to challenge some of these underlying assumptions, which are that you can’t account for these dollars,” said David A. Catania (I-At Large), chairman of the council’s Education Committee. “Whether it’s a final draft or not, you still won’t be able to account for these dollars.”

TAG provides District students with up to $10,000 apiece for out-of-state public schools and up to $2,500 per year for historically black colleges and private schools in the Washington area. Congress has appropriated $317 million for the subsidy since its inception in 2000, helping more than 20,000 students pay for college.

The auditors questioned two large expenditures — $5.5 million in fiscal 2004 and $4 million in 2008 — that they said could not be explained by officials at OSSE or the city’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer.

TAG funds left unspent at the end of each year can be carried over to the next, so uncertainty about expenditures in one year can cascade into the future. City officials have estimated the carry-over from 2012 to 2013 to have been between $2.6 million and $22 million, the audit says. The auditors urged the two agencies to agree on the correct amount as soon as possible, but that hasn’t happened.

Though the audit was completed in September, OSSE did not share it until late January or early February, said Deloras A. Shepherd, associate chief financial officer. Asked why OSSE waited so long to share the information, Aguirre apologized.

“I don’t have an answer for that,” he said.

Amid the uncertainty about how much money was available for students, OSSE officials last year requested and received more than $9 million in local tax dollars to supplement its congressional appropriation. TAG has never had to turn away eligible students for lack of funds.

Amid the uncertainty about how much money was available for students, OSSE officials last year requested and received more than $9 million in local tax dollars to supplement its congressional appropriation. TAG has never had to turn away eligible students for lack of funds.

Catania and fellow Education Committee member David Grosso (I-At Large) expressed exasperation that the agency had asked for extra funds without anyone from OSSE or the Office of the Chief Financial Officer knowing how much money should actually be in TAG accounts.

“Who’s running this operation?” Catania asked.

“It blows my mind,” Grosso said. “This is really a head-scratcher.”

TAG did not end up using much of the $9 million last year, and $7.9 million of it was rolled over to this year. That money will go toward filling the gap between this year’s congressional appropriation of $30 million and TAG’s estimated budget of about $33.7 million, officials said.

Catania is pushing for a locally funded scholarship program called D.C. Promise, which D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) has warned could discourage Congress from continuing to fund TAG.

Catania said Monday that the city cannot rely on TAG’s federal appropriations alone to meet the need for college aid.

Aguirre agreed. “There is a point in time in the next year or two that we will be short on funding,” he said. “As you stated, essentially the federal allocation hasn’t kept up with the cost of tuition.”

Catania said he expects OSSE to submit a final audit and an agreed-upon carry-over figure before its budget hearing in the spring.

 

 

 

Comment

Comment

Oversight Hearings Week in Review Feb 17-21

February, March and April are an especially busy time at the D.C. Council between performance oversight hearings for city agencies and hearings on the budget for Fiscal Year 2015. Since most residents don’t have time to watch hours upon hours of Council hearings—many happening simultaneously—we thought we’d be your eyes and ears into what’s happening here at the Wilson Building. We present our week in review!

The hearings last week for committees on which Councilemember Grosso sits all took place on Wednesday, February 19.

Perhaps predictably, the Transportation and the Environment Committee oversight hearing with the DC Taxicab Commission (DCTC) got the most attention in the press—including a mention of a recent experience of Councilmember Grosso’s wife with a cab that had no credit card machine. The Councilmember pressed DCTC chair Ron Linton on the topic, who said that perhaps 10-12% of cabs are “resisting” compliance with the credit card payment mandate. Accessibility was another key issue, particularly as the only public witnesses described the findings of the Disability Advisory Committee for DCTC. We look forward to receiving the Committee’s final report and working to ensure that its recommendations are implemented. Additionally, the Commission is set to issue new regulations for hired car services in the coming year and we will be keeping a close eye on that. The Councilmember asked about this and other items in a follow-up letter after the hearing.

Following the spirited dialogue that took place during the DC Taxicab Commission oversight hearing, the Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) hearing was markedly lighter. You can read the follow-up letter that the Couniclmember sent to the Department after the hearing.

  • DPR touted a 90% customer service satisfaction ranking based on special event and customer satisfaction surveys they received.
  • Community advocates praised DPR for their commitment to building new playgrounds and hosting events like the Summer Hiring Fair set for February 22.  This effort is the result of a partnership between DOES and DPR.
  • DPR is working closely with the community to bring the Friendship Park project to life.  This project will include a splash park, a performance stage and more.
  • Questions arose regarding delayed facility openings, unexpected closures and how DPR communicates these issues to the public.
  • And finally, we learned that DPR Park Rangers are in fact, not a police force.  All in a day’s work.

The State Board of Education, the Deputy Mayor for Education and DC Public Library were up in the Committee on Education oversight hearing. From school discipline and early childhood education to facility modernization and maintenance, a lot of issues were covered. Here are a couple highlights from witness testimony and questioning.

  • The Deputy Mayor for Education and the Office of the State Superintendent of Education have partnered with the Department of Employment Services to launch a Reengagement Center for disconnected youth this fall.
  • There are a great number of schools that have critical modernization needs, such as Powell and Garrison, but Councilmember Grosso pressed the Deputy Mayor to encourage the Mayor, D.C. Public Schools, and Department of General Services to revisit the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and at a minimum move up the modernization plans for several schools that are not in compliance with the Americans With Disability Act such as Banneker and Bruce Monroe at Parkview.
  • The State Board of Education will be hiring the new Ombudsman by the end of February. Be on the lookout for that announcement!
  • Advocates for public libraries are expanding their focus beyond the existing DC Public Library branches, and are pushing for a general interest library at the DC Jail. Hard to believe they don’t already have one.

Meanwhile, the Committee on Business, Consumer and Regulatory Affairs was conducting its oversight hearing with agencies big and small—the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA), the Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking (DISB), the Office of the Tenant Advocate (OTA) and the Alcohol and Beverage Regulatory Administration (ABRA).

Advocates voiced concerns about noise levels from Dupont Circle clubs—exceeding the highest allowable sound level of 50 decibels.   Regulation is a problem because MPD can write a citation with direct evidence, ABRA can enforce noise violations if they come when called, but DCRA is responsible for measuring the sounds waves with one of the TWO meter readers the city owns.  ABRA agreed to work with MPD and DCRA to publish reports about noise violation enforcement and look into getting another meter.

A loophole in the Foreclosure Mediation Program allows mortgage lenders to file lawsuits against homeowners in D.C. Superior Court—and avoid the statutory requirement for a Mediation Certificate.  The Mediation Certificate is intended to protect the lendee from costly litigation and robo-signing fraud.   The certificate is supposed to be required for foreclosures that are non-judicial procedures or lawsuit. 

DCRA spent the last year working to modernize their information technology system.  “Project Dox” was launched in 2013 and 300 business licenses were issued online (about 10% of licenses issued).  DCRA intends to issue at least a quarter of their overall licenses in 2014 online.   They are also implementing a web-portal that will allow cross-agency information sharing. 

Councilmember Grosso adjourned his first hearing—the Chairman had to jet and we just had too many questions to ask. 

Throughout all four oversight hearings, Councilmember Grosso pressed agency heads on transparency and accessibility. He asked each agency about its compliance with federal “508” standards for ensuring that websites are accessible to persons with disabilities including vision impairment. Continuing his effort to ensure information about District boards and commissions is available, the Councilmember also asked each agency about those bodies under its purview. While some agencies are doing better than others in this area, it is clear that our bill to create a centralized list of boards and commissions with all the relevant information is still necessary.

Quote of the Week:

"I won't bore you with the stories of sex on windshields while men enjoy the show from inside their cars, the urination all over our front entrance or the make-shift bar that popped up in the adjoining vacant building’s parking lot for “pre-bar parties” out of a van." –A Dupont Circle resident describing scenes in the neighborhood

Stat of the Week:

In DCPS, less than 50% of African-American boys graduate from high school in four years.

Comment