Comment

Two long reads for the long weekend

Here are two recent articles that I found interesting, and thought you might like to read over this long weekend:

Schooled

Cory Booker, Chris Christie, and Mark Zuckerberg had a plan to reform Newark’s schools. They got an education.

by Dale Russakoff May 19, 2014

The New Yorker

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/05/19/140519fa_fact_russakoff?currentPage=all

 

Who Gets to Graduate?

By PAUL TOUGH MAY 15, 2014

New York Times Magazine

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/magazine/who-gets-to-graduate.html?_r=0

    Comment

    Comment

    Video of our panel discussion on the school to prison pipeline

    We had an excellent film screening and discussion on Wednesday about the school to prison pipeline. Thanks to Andy Shallal and Busboys & Poets for hosting us, to Adeleke Omitowoju and the Dream Defenders for the amazing film, and our incredible panelists and moderator, Thena Robinson Mock (The Advancement Project), Dr. Ian Roberts (The Academies at Anacostia), Eduardo Ferrer, (DC Lawyers for Youth), and Tiffany Loftin. You can watch the panel and the discussion below. Stay tuned for follow-up events.

    Comment

    1 Comment

    Grosso Announces New Initiative to Collaboratively Draft DC Laws Online with the Public

    For Immediate Release:

    May 16, 2014

    Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

    (202) 724-8105

     

    Grosso Announces New Initiative to Collaboratively Draft DC Laws Online with the Public

    MadisonDC powers historic initiative to give the public a direct voice in the creation of District legislation, starting with bills on urban agriculture, open primaries, and marijuana policy

     

    Washington, D.C.--Today, Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) and The OpenGov Foundation announced that three legislative proposals on urban farming, tax and regulation of marijuana, and open primaries are now open on the Internet to give the public a direct voice in the lawmaking process. This historic effort is made possible by the new Madison online lawmaking tool, empowering all residents to log on, be heard and ensure that their elected officials get policy right for the District.  MadisonDC connects people directly with their elected officials, turning a confusing lawmaking process into an interactive, seamless user experience where everyone can add their input. Grosso will review and consider suggestions starting today and ending June 12.

    WATCH: Grosso Invites Constituents to Help Draft DC Legislation

    “As we encourage more public engagement in the legislative process, I hope D.C. residents will take a moment to log onto the Madison project,” said Councilmember Grosso. “I look forward to seeing the public input on my proposed bills.”

    Grosso is the first-ever local elected official to give residents—and others—a chance to participate in their municipal lawmaking process on the Internet. The three bills currently online with MadisonDC for public input are the D.C. Urban Farming and Food Security Act of 2014, the Marijuana Legalization and Regulation Act of 2013, and the Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014. MadisonDC not only opens up legislation to feedback from local residents, but also from people around the United States and other parts of the world who have experiences with similar laws and can provide their perspectives.

    “We are excited to support Councilmember Grosso’s unprecedented efforts to bring residents - and their ideas--directly into the local lawmaking process.  But what really matters is that we’re going to produce better City Council bills, with fewer frustrations and unintended consequences,” said OpenGov Foundation Executive Director Seamus Kraft.

    “These three bills are only a start,” Kraft continued.  “The ultimate goal of MadisonDC is transforming D.C.’s entire policymaking machine for the Internet Age, creating a completely seamless, on-demand collaboration ecosystem for both citizens and city officials.  The possibilities are limitless.”

     

    About MadisonDC

    Madison is a free online policymaking tool created by the non-partisan, non-profit OpenGov Foundation to empower you to participate in your government, efficiently access your elected officials, and hold them accountable.  Currently in beta, Madison is open source software that can be used to put any policymaking process online, increasing government transparency and connecting users like you directly to the decision-makers in our democracy.  Click here if you want Madison working to improve your local, county or state government results.

     

    ###

    1 Comment

    1 Comment

    Grosso prepares for weekend in prison

    By Councilmember David Grosso

    Beginning this afternoon and continuing throughout the weekend, I will experience the Alternatives to Violence Program (AVP) at Patuxent Institution in Jessup, Maryland.  I will join inmate facilitators and other participants engaging together in the AVP workshops inside the prison. 

    The AVP program began in 1975 with a group named “Think Tank” who started an experimental program for youth at Green Haven Prison in New York.  The group was compelled to provide nonviolence training in preparation for their roles as counselors. “Think Tank” then partnered with the Quaker Project on Community Conflict and created a prison workshop that is currently provided in seven institutions.

    What led me to participate in this three day workshop in Patuxent is a desire to experience first-hand whether or not the AVP method can help in stemming the senseless violence in D.C. – from neighborhood beefs, to violence within our schools. Within the first two months of this year, the murder rate has doubled in D.C and as a community we must stand together to say enough is enough.  The violence has to stop!

    I will share with you my reflections on the AVP workshops. I look forward to your comments and working together to create a city that can embrace nonviolent conflict resolution as a standard practice.

    1 Comment

    Comment

    Grosso’s Reproductive Rights Legislation to Protect Women and Families

    For Immediate Release

    May 6, 2014

    Contact: Dionne Johnson Calhoun

    (202) 724-8105

     

    Grosso’s Reproductive Rights Legislation to Protect Women and Families  

    Washington, D.C. – Today, Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large) introduced the Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014, a bill to amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 to ensure that individuals are protected from discrimination by an employer or employment agency based on an individual’s reproductive health decision making, including a decision to use a particular drug, device, or medical service based on an employer’s personal beliefs about such methods of family planning.

    Nationally, there have been a number of disturbing cases of bosses retaliating against employees for their reproductive health care decisions. For example, in Wisconsin, after the state legislature passed a law requiring insurance plans to cover contraception, the Catholic diocese told employees that if they used the benefit, they would be fired. In the past 4 years alone, individuals in California, Texas, Montana, and Indiana have brought discrimination suits against their employers after being fired from their jobs for being pregnant without being married

    Recently, a Supreme Court case brought by Hobby Lobby explored whether the federal government can require for-profit companies to provide coverage for forms of birth control that conflict with the company owners’ personal religious beliefs. The Hobby Lobby case is only one of more than 100 federal lawsuits by employers seeking to limit contraception coverage benefits that are available under the Affordable Care Act.

    “An employer should not be able to tell their employee whether or not they can access certain kinds of health care,” said Grosso.  “While the District enjoys some of the strongest non-discrimination laws in the country, this specific legislation signals that we stand by the rights of women and families to make their own reproductive health decisions without involvement from their employer.”

    ###

    Comment

    Comment

    Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014

    A BILL

    IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

     

    Councilmember David Grosso introduced the following bill, which was referred to the

    Committee on __________________.

    An ACT to amend the Human Rights Act of 1977 to ensure that individuals are protected fromdiscrimination by an employer or employment agency based an  individual’s or dependent’s reproductive health decision making.

                BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Reproductive Health Non-Discrimination Amendment Act of 2014”.

                Sec. 2. Section 211 (D.C. Official Code § 2-1402.11) of the Human Rights Act of 1977, effective December 13, 1977 (D.C. Law 2-38; D.C. Official Code § 2-1401.01 et seq.), is amended to add a subsection (d) to read as follows:

                “ (d) An employer or employment agency shall not discriminate against an individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of or on the basis of the individual’s or a dependent’s reproductive health decision making, including a decision to use or access a particular drug, device or medical service, because of or on the basis of an employer’s personal beliefs about such services.”

                (b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit any rights of an employee provided through any other provision of law or collective bargaining unit.

    Sec. 3.  Fiscal impact statement.
    The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement in the committee report as the

    fiscal impact statement required by section 602(c)(3) of the District of Columbia Home Rule
    Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(3)).

    Sec. 4.  Effective date.
                This act shall take effect following approval by the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), a 30-day period of Congressional review as provided in section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat. 813; D.C. Official Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)), and publication in the District of Columbia Register.

     

    Comment

    Comment

    Save the Date: May 14 film screening & discussion on school-to-prison pipeline

    Break the Cycle: Ending the School-to-Prison Pipeline

    Film screening and discussion

    May 14, 2014, 6pm-8pm

    Busboys and Poets 2021 14th St NW

    RSVP for this event -- Please note that seating at the venue is first come, first serve

    Join Councilmember David Grosso, Ghost Note Agency, and the Dream Defenders for a documentary screening and panel discussion on school discipline policies and the school-to-prison pipeline.

    The documentary, produced by the Dream Defenders, examines current public policy and school discipline practices that have landed a disproportionate number of students of color trapped within the school-to-prison pipeline in urban cities such as the District of Columbia, Baltimore, and Philadelphia.

    Following the screening, three panelists will share critical insight on the dynamics of the epidemic and trends happening nationally and locally.

    Panelists:

    • Thena Robinson Mock, Project Director - Ending the Schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track, a project of The Advancement Project
    • Dr. Ian Roberts, Principal - The Academies at Anacostia
    • Eduardo Ferrer, Legal and Policy Director - DC Lawyers for Youth

    Why attend?

    • The Impact of the School to Prison Pipeline has been made a national point of discussion by Attorney General Eric Holder and Education Secretary Arne Duncan
    • It costs approximately $47,000 per inmate per year to keep a young (and relatively healthy) inmate locked up.  
    • Minority students have less access to advanced courses, more inexperienced teachers and face tougher disciplinary consequences than their counterparts, a new trove of federal data shows, affirming long-held beliefs about disparities in the classroom.
    • 40 percent of Black youths with disabilities are arrested after leaving high school compared to 27 percent of White youths with disabilities.

    For more information, please contact the Office of Councilmember David Grosso at (202) 724-8105.

    Comment

    Comment

    Dispelling confusion about DMV and REAL ID

    In the past week, there have been several reports regarding deadlines for D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to comply with a federal law known as REAL ID. Unclear information caused many D.C. residents to raise concerns that they would need to rush to the DMV to obtain a new REAL ID by a May 1, 2014 deadline.  Please note that this is not the case. Below we outline some key questions and answers.

    Do I need to get a new license or ID?

    Only if your license or ID is due to expire. Otherwise, your license or ID will remain valid for all purposes until its expiration date.

    Do I need to get a new ID before 2016 in order to board planes?

    Only if your ID is due to expire. Contrary to initial reports, all IDs issued by D.C. DMV will remain valid beyond 2016 if their expiration date is after 2016. If your license is due to expire in 2018, for example, you do not need to worry, and you can continue to use it for all purposes until it expires.

    Will DMV contact me about getting a new license?

    DMV will be contacting D.C. residents whose IDs are set to expire to inform them of the documentation they will need to bring with them to get a new license. Due to REAL ID implementation, no one will be able to renew licenses online until they get a REAL ID compliant ID. To renew your license or ID you will need to bring: proof of identity such as birth certificate or passport, proof of social security number such as a card or W-2 form, a green card or other proof of lawful presence in the United States, and two documents proving current residence in the District of Columbia from this list.

    More information can be found on DMV’s website.

    Comment

    Comment

    Advocates Rally In Support Of Repealing Prostitution Free Zones In D.C.

    By Sarah Anne Hughes on DCist, April 11, 2014

    More than a dozen people rallied outside the Wilson Building today to show support for a transgender woman of color who they say was targeted by police in Arizona and a bill being considered by the Council to repeal "prostitution free zones" in D.C.

    Monica Jones, a student at Arizona State University’s School of Social Work, was arrested in May 2013 by an undercover police officer for “manifesting prostitution" as part of Project ROSE, which, as Vice put it, arrests sex workers in the name of saving them. Jones' case goes to trial today.

    Friday's event, organized in part by HIPS (Helping Individual Prostitutes Survive), the D.C. Trans Coalition and Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, was held to raise awareness about Jones' case and the bill, said Elizabeth Saracco, direct of programs for HIPS. The bill, introduced by Councilmember David Grosso (I-At Large), would repeal a nine-year-old "provision of the D.C. Code [that] permits the Metropolitan Police Department to declare a particular location as a prostitution free zone for a 20-day period." Once declared, "it is unlawful for a group of two or more persons to congregate in a public space or property in that area for the purpose of engaging in prostitution or prostitution-related offenses."

    "Police officers can then ask any group of two or more people who an officer 'reasonably believes' is in the prostitution free zone for the purpose of sex work to vacate the area," Grosso wrote in an op-ed for the Washington Blade. "If the people do not leave the area then they can be arrested."

    Saracco said "numerous" transgender woman of color have complained to HIPS about harassment by police in prostitution free zones — "that their lives have been made difficult." This has not been an issue for male or white sex workers, she said. A task force report prepared by the Anti-Defamation League for MPD echoed this: "The mistreatment of transgender individuals — and particularly transgender women of color — by police officers is among the most frequently cited and egregious examples of bias and misconduct."

    The law has also done little to actually reduce prostitution, Saracco said.

    "It's something that's been on my mind for quite awhile," Grosso said outside the Wilson Building today. "It just gave MPD an opportunity to discriminate in a way that I think is unjust."

    Grosso said he's been told by MPD that they aren't actually enforcing or implementing the law: "So it's really an opportunity for us to stand up and speak for something that's right and just."

    Kevin O'Connor, a Dupont Circle ANC commissioner, agrees and says he plans to write a resolution in support of Grosso's bill. His ANC previously passed a resolution opposing Councilmember Yvette Alexander's (D-Ward 7) legislation to allow police to create permanent prostitution free zones.

    "The Dupont Circle community is concerned about it," O'Connor said, citing the area's LGBT history.

    When asked if there's been pushback against the bill, Grosso said "not at this point."

    "I think it was a bad idea to start with, so they recognize that now, that it really is an easy way to violate someone's human rights," Grosso said. "So it's time to get ride of them, get them off the books."

    Comment

    Comment

    Time to repeal ‘prostitution free zones’

    By David Grosso

    Published April 3, 2014, The Washington Blade

    My commitment to human rights predates my time in office and a human rights framework is interwoven into all of the work I do here on the D.C. Council. I was disturbed when I read a report released last month on relations between the LGBT community and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). A task force of experts who investigated MPD’s handling of hate crimes drafted and released the report. The report documents a number of problems and makes recommendations for how to address the way MPD interacts with the LGBT community. What I found most troubling was the task force’s finding that “the mistreatment of transgender individuals — and particularly transgender women of color — by police officers is among the most frequently cited and egregious examples of bias and misconduct.” Unfortunately, that is not news to many in the LGBT community.

    The recommendations in the report from the hate crimes assessment task force are directed to MPD and should be implemented quickly. Outside of the task force, seven community-based organizations (Casa Ruby, The D.C. Center, D.C. Trans Coalition, GLAA, GLOV, HIPS and Rainbow Response) came together and issued additional recommendations for both MPD and the D.C. Council. Chief Lanier is already moving forward with the reforms, in close collaboration with the community groups and the task force. To continue this effort, the D.C. Council must also act quickly. I have decided to implement one of the coalition’s recommendations immediately by introducing a bill to repeal “prostitution free zones” in D.C.

    This provision of the D.C. Code permits MPD to declare a particular location as a prostitution free zone for a 20-day period. Police officers can then ask any group of two or more people who an officer “reasonably believes” is in the prostitution free zone for the purpose of sex work to vacate the area. If the people do not leave the area then they can be arrested. According to the task force report, transgender women (African Americans and Latinas in particular) express that MPD officers regularly view and treat them as criminals. This stereotype—that all transgender women are always engaging in sex trade—is damaging and results in their human rights being violated. This happens when police stop or arrest someone based on who they are rather than what they are doing. The prostitution free zones reinforce this bias.

    The task force, along with previous research, found that this bias also means that when transgender women approach police for help, they all too often face hostility and don’t receive assistance. It is important for police officers to not stereotype transgender women in this way. But it is also critical that police officers help someone who is assaulted or raped, even if they were involved in sex work. MPD is responsible for the safety of everyone, including sex workers.

    Repeal of the prostitution free zones is long overdue for several reasons. First, the statute is likely unconstitutional—the Attorney General’s office testified in January 2012 that, “we have substantial concerns about [the law’s] constitutional soundness.” Second, MPD has not initiated any prostitution free zones since 2012—indeed, officials told me that they do not oppose repeal of the prostitution free zone section of law. Perhaps most importantly, the prostitution free zones, and the inevitable profiling that happens within them, violate affected residents’ human right to be free from discrimination.

    Just as we are reconsidering other laws that have been found to be discriminatory, I think it is time that we open up the conversation regarding how we handle commercial sex. We need to consider changing from a framework of criminalization to a framework that emphasizes the health and human rights of those involved. Meanwhile, let’s make the easy decision to take a constitutionally suspect law off the books and repeal the prostitution free zones.

    Comment

    Comment

    Mayor Gray proposes his budget for 2015

    This morning Mayor Gray presented his his proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2015 to the D.C. Council. Over the next month, Council committees will hold hearings on the budget, with opportunities for the public to testify, as well as hearing from government agencies. Here we present the presentation the Mayor made to the Council about the budget (a broad overview); the Budget Support Act (authorizing legislation that will be amended and eventually passed);  and the Supplemental Budget Plan (re-allocation of funds for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2014). Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have questions, including on Twitter!

    Here is the Budget Support Act--it's big! It is subject to amendments and approval by the Council:

    Here is the Supplemental Budget Plan--it outlines how the Mayor plans to re-allocate funds from the Fiscal Year 2014 budget, to spend unspent funds and cover cost overruns.

    Comment

    Comment

    Frequently Asked Questions: D.C. Urban Farming and Food Security Act of 2014, B20-677

    Introduced by: Councilmembers David Grosso, Mary Cheh, and Tommy Wells

    Co-sponsored by: Councilmembers Muriel Bowser, Kenyan McDuffie, and Phil Mendelson

    Referred to: Committee of the Whole and Committee on Finance and Revenue

                                                                                                      

    What are the major components of the D.C. Urban Farming and Food Security Act of 2014?

    This legislation establishes an initiative that first identifies and then leases certain District-owned vacant lots to independent farmers and farm cooperatives to be used for successful urban farming ventures. It also creates tax incentives to encourage more individuals and businesses to farm locally and donate locally farmed vegetables, fruits, and grains to D.C. food banks or shelters.

    Why should the District lease its vacant property to local farmers?

    Activating vacant unimproved properties owned by the District and owned privately is important. Not only would this effort help to ensure that these properties are environmentally safe, but also that they are a welcomed, safe attraction in communities. 

    What would be the process for individuals or organizations looking to lease land?

    If approved and signed into law, by February 2015, the Mayor would need to identify 25 District-owned vacant lots that can potentially be used for successful urban farming ventures. The Mayor would then develop a Request for Proposal process for applications.

    How long would leases last for under this initiative?

    All lease agreements entered into under this initiative would be for a term of at least 3 years.

    Will farmers be able to sell produce on the property?

    Yes. Any lease entered into pursuant to this initiative with an independent farm or farm cooperative may permit the sale of fresh fruits and vegetables on the leased land, off the leased land, or both.

    Is it true that your bill would provide property tax abatement for leasing vacant land to farmers?

    Yes.  Under this legislation, if an owner of unimproved real property enters into a lease with an unrelated party for the use of its real property for the purpose of producing food commodity through small-scale urban farming, there shall be allowed a 50% deduction from the real property tax imposed on the portion of leased real property actually used for small-scale farming.

    What are the eligibility requirements for the property tax abatement?

    In order to be eligible for the tax abatement under this section, any lease agreement shall include, but is not limited to, all the following provisions, and the parties thereto shall be in compliance therewith:

    1. An initial term of not less than three years;
    2. Active use and cultivation of at least 5,000 square feet of the real property;
    3. A requirement that the entire property subject to the lease shall be dedicated toward agriculture use; and
    4. A prohibition against any dwelling units (as defined in § 47-813(d)(3)) on the real property.

    What kind of tax incentive does the bill provide to individuals who donate to D.C. food banks or shelters?

    A taxpayer may claim a nonrefundable credit against income taxes for food commodity donations made during the tax year to a District of Columbia food bank or shelter. The credit claimed shall equal 50% of the value of the contribution and shall not to exceed $2,500 per taxpayer per tax year.

    What kind of tax incentive does the bill provide to businesses who donate to D.C. food banks or shelters?

    A business may claim a nonrefundable credit against business taxes for food commodity donations made during the tax year to a District of Columbia food bank or shelter. The credit claimed shall equal 50% of the value of the contribution and shall not to exceed $5,000 per taxpayer per tax year.

    How will these tax incentives be monitored?

    Individuals and businesses claiming the tax credit or property tax abatement will need to provide documentation supporting the claim in a form and manner prescribed by the Chief Financial Officer.

    Why is this legislation important?

    D.C. residents at all times have access to sufficient safe nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life. Food security is built on three pillars: food availability; food access; and food use.  By the District leasing its unused vacant property throughout the city to independent farmers and community farm cooperatives it allows our residents to claim direct access to healthy food by growing, harvesting and processing it themselves. By incentivizing more individuals and businesses to proactively donate to local food banks or homeless shelters we can support organizations like Miriam’s Kitchen that manages to make wonderful meals for our most vulnerable residents out of very little, day-in and day-out.

     

     

    Comment

    Comment

    Marijuana Decriminalization Bill Signed into Law, Grosso Urges Council to Act on Barriers to Employment

    Yesterday, Mayor Vince Gray signed into law a bill to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana.  Grosso was pleased to join Mayor Gray with the Council in signaling his support for ending the racial disparities with regard to marijuana related arrests in the District of Columbia. The repercussions of even misdemeanor marijuana possession charges or convictions are anything but minor, effecting employment, housing, and even federal financial aid.  Although passage of this bill was a good first step, Grosso believes that the government must do more to reduce the barriers for those convicted with a marijuana possession charge. Out of concern for the 60,000 D.C. residents with a criminal history whom are unemployed, Grosso introduced the “Record Sealing for Non-Violent Marijuana Possession Act of 2013” last September and urges the Council to pass this important legislation.


    The bill requires that criminal records be sealed by the Metropolitan Police Department and D.C. Superior Court for all persons convicted of a non-violent possession of marijuana.  The sealing of records will include criminal history of notation of arrests, detentions, indictments, sentencing, correctional supervision, rehabilitation and release.  Another provision in the legislation will block employers from asking if an applicant previously had their records expunged or sealed. 

    “Our city is negatively impacted because of the stigma associated with an individual who has a criminal record,” said Grosso.  “As we have seen over many decades with the War on Drugs – society can be unforgiving.  Government policies should not create road blocks that deny an individual a second chance. This bill is important because it will create an opportunity for individuals with a non-violent possession of marijuana record to become productive members of society without barriers to becoming gainfully employed.” 

    The legislation was co-sponsored by Councilmembers Bonds (D-At Large), Bowser (D-Ward 4), Cheh (D-Ward 3), McDuffie (D-Ward5), Alexander (D-Ward 7), Barry (D-Ward 8), and Chairman Mendelson. Councilmember Wells (D-Ward 6), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee held a hearing on this bill in December.

     

    ###

     

    Comment

    Comment

    A runoff system would improve the District’s democratic process

    A runoff system would improve the District’s democratic process

    By The Washington Post Editorial Board

    Published: March 27

    AMONG THE calculations some District voters are weighing in advance of Tuesday’s Democratic primary is whether to bypass the person they most want elected in favor of a candidate whom they think might have a better chance of winning. Underscoring that dilemma is an expected low voter turnout and a large field of candidates that could produce a winner with a meager plurality. Not exactly the best recipe for democracy.

    That is why there is much merit to a package of reforms being championed by D.C. Council member David Grosso (I-At Large) that would overhaul how elections are held in the District. Legislation introduced this month by Mr. Grosso would solve the problem of candidates winning without a majority of votes. He favors an instant-runoff system that casts and tabulates votes by ranked choice. He also would allow registered voters to change their party affiliation all the way through Election Day, which could increase turnout.

    The current primary system effectively disenfranchises a swath of District voters who don’t identify with a political party. The number is growing, with an estimated 76,000 voters — some 17 percent of the city electorate — registered as independents. Removing the barriers to their participation in the democratic process would be a healthy move. So would ensuring that people elected to public office have a mandate from a majority of voters.

    None of these changes would take place in time for this year’s elections. The legislation — along with a third measure that would require candidates to show they or their previous campaign committee have no outstanding fines or other debts to the city — has been referred to committee. Their prospects are uncertain, since it’s hard to focus interest on election reform once an election is past. That, though, is exactly when the changes must be enacted so as not to change the rules midstream, during a pending contest.

    A more serious hurdle is likely that the people who need to enact these measures are the ones most liable to see their self-interests hurt, because current election methods favor and protect incumbency. We would urge them to follow the lead of Mr. Grosso. He understands that if the new rules are in place in 2016, as he hopes, he might be standing for reelection in a more competitive field and having to appeal to more voters. But he told us the purpose of being on the council shouldn’t be about protecting one’s seat but rather “trying to do things better in the long run.” Let’s see which of his colleagues agree.

    Comment

    Comment

    Performance Oversight Hearing recap for March 21, 2014

    The winter weather has decided to stick around a little while longer and as a result of the snow, the Committee on Transportation and the Environment rescheduled the performance oversight hearing of the Bicycle Advisory Council (BAC), Pedestrian Advisory Council (PAC) and the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) several times.  Finally, on Friday, March 21, the hearing got underway, and ran for six hours.

    Bicycle Advisory Council (BAC):

    • In FY13, the BAC was unable to access the $10,000 budgeted for them due to a lack of clarity on the process to access the funds.
    • Frequently, the BAC makes recommendations to DDOT as it relates to bike safety and infrastructure.  BAC’s facilities committee is working to develop a mechanism to track their recommendations and whether or not DDOT has made progress to implement them.  The BAC noted that there is still not strong follow-through on the part of DDOT.

    Pedestrian Advisory Council (PAC):

    • In FY13, the PAC created the Enforcement & Education Committee as well as the Walking Environment Committee.  These committees work to increase awareness around pedestrian safety.
    • The PAC is continuing their efforts to advocate for more traffic control officers and expressed support for photo enforcement.
    • The PAC still has concerns with the slow progress of DDOT on addressing sidewalk gaps.

    District Dept. of Transportation (DDOT):

    • For residents living within the District’s 68.3 square miles, parking can often be a challenge.  DDOT is reviewing the District-wide residential parking program (RPP) and making changes to the wards that were re-districted, as well as updating their files.  The review process is 95% complete.
    • Wouldn’t it be nice to tweet confusing parking signage to DDOT and get a response immediately?  Well Councilmember Grosso recommended this and DDOT explained that they currently receive pictures and complaints via Twitter and emails, as well as, receiving calls through 311.  DDOT officials noted that there is a 311 mobile app that allows users to upload pictures, which are then submitted to DDOT’s work order management system and assigned a ticket number.  DDOT continues to make improvements to streets signs, working block-by-block to fix confusing signage.
    • Food truck advocates expressed that while few signs do exist for street vendors, more are needed and all signs should specify the times for which vendors can park.  DDOT explained that the rollout of the Mobile Roadway Vending (MRV) locations has, overall, been good; however, they are trying to work out a few kinks.  Specifically, DDOT explained that there is a challenge with creating permanent signage (currently they provide temporary signs) because once a permanent sign goes up, it is increasingly more difficult to go back and make any adjustments to them.
    • Safety is always a priority and each year DDOT works to identify 50 dangerous intersection locations, a process that tends to take 2 years to address with the first year dedicated to design plans and the 2nd year devoted to construction.  This year, DDOT is working to provide pavement markings, high visibility signs and more.
    • More construction is on the way!  Councilmember Grosso explained that the intersection located at 4th Street, Massachusetts Avenue and H Street NW is extremely dangerous and confusing.  The Councilmember requested that a traffic control officer be placed at this location; however it won’t happen.  DDOT expressed their concerns with this intersection but stated that in a few weeks massive construction will be taking place at this site.  To assist residents with their daily commutes, DDOT stated that they will be able to produce some site maps informing residents of where major construction is taking place and offering alternative routes.

     

     

     

     

    Comment

    Comment

    Councilmember Grosso's Opening Statement for the Finance & Revenue Oversight Hearing of the D.C. Commission on Arts and Humanities

    Thank you, Chairman Evans. And thank you to the witnesses who are here today to testify for the annual oversight hearing for the Commission on the Arts and Humanities.

    When a city has a thriving arts community, it signals support for, and recognition of, the value that a creative economy brings to a city.  A creative economy exists when the ideas of individuals generate public ideas, products, and services through financial assistance.  A creative economy integrates multiple artistic and entrepreneurial disciplines.  Investment in all stages of creation fosters innovative and artistic benefits for our homes, schools, offices, and streets.       

    To cultivate a creative economy, the government must play a larger role because while we have the funding, we lack the mechanisms to support the distribution of funds.  Our city will have a thriving, artistically expressive, and vibrant community if it collectively supports all of the sectors that make up the creative economy.   There are at least four steps we need to take in order to do this successfully:

    • First, we need to have plans in place to fund the space where an artist works.  This means funding for studios, living quarters, theater space, galleries, and public outdoor spaces that can house large installations. 
    • Second, we must cultivate relationships with new artists and maintain on-going relationships with established artists in the city.  We must insist that art is present everywhere and in order to do this we must support the artists and musicians.   We should be able to easily track the artists in our city and what projects they are working on and what support they need.   There should be an identifiable connection between our community and the networks of artists in D.C.
    • Third, we must support the institutions that are already serving our city and have been for decades.  These theater companies and music and dance studios are already executing the production process.  The support they need is with capital projects, infrastructure, and wrap around services in order to sustain their businesses.  We should broaden our idea of what supporting the arts means and not only invest in the finished product, but also invest in what is necessary to sustain ongoing production.
    • And lastly, we need to finance finished products.  We have acres of government owned, unused or underutilized land throughout the city, particularly in neighborhoods that would greatly benefit from public art pieces.  We need to be financing music, dance, and performing art schools so that all of our residents can access it, learn about it, and participate in it organically.  Again, this should be the responsibility of the government and not the people of District. 

    In order to accomplish all of the categories that I mentioned, we need a strong, capable, and willing Commission that can think broadly about how we can create these opportunities and will take on the burden to grow the creative economy in the District.   We need creative minds at the Commission, those who are thinking about ways to spend funds with vision and efficiency.  If DCCAH can execute a strong plan then it will be in the position to be a recognized leader in how arts and humanities support should look.  There is no reason why our jazz festival cannot compare to New Orleans’, our film festivals to Sundance, or our public art shows to Basel or the Biennale. 

    I am interested to hear the Commission’s plans for its future and to know what they are doing in the community.   I look forward to the witness testimony and engaging with you in the discussions that follow it.  Thank you.

     

    Comment